The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2019
Survival results in biphasic malignant pleural mesothelioma patients: A multicentric analysis.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lococo Filippo, Torricelli Federica, Lang-Lazdunski Loic, Veronesi Giulia, Rena Ottavio, Paci Massimiliano, Casadio Caterina, Piana Simonetta, Novellis Pierluigi, Di Stefano Teresa Severina, Ciarrocchi Alessia, Billè Andrea
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The best strategy of care for biphasic malignant pleural mesothelioma (Biph-MPM) is controversial. In this study, a large dataset of Biph-MPM cases was reviewed to identify prognostic factors and to evaluate the role of a multimodal approach, including cancer-directed surgery.
METHODS: A total of 213 patients with Biph-MPM treated at 4 tertiary centers who experienced MPM from January 2009 to December 2016 were selected, and clinical, pathologic, and surgical information was retrieved. A Cox regression model was used to identify predictors of survival, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to summarize overall survival.
RESULTS: The mean age and the male/female ratio were 68.4 ± 9.5 years and 5:1, respectively. Tumors were assigned to stages I (127, 59.6%), II (3, 1.4%), III (76, 35.4%), and IV (7, 3.3%) according to the Eighth Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) edition. A multimodal treatment including pleurectomy/decortication was performed in 58 patients (27.2%), chemotherapy alone in 99 patients (46.5%), and best supportive care in 56 (26.3%). The median overall survival was 11 months. A univariate analysis revealed that survival was significantly associated with the percentage forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P < .0001), performance status (P = .0002), multimodal treatment including surgery (P < .0001), and TNM stage (P = .011). A multivariable analysis confirmed performance status, percentage forced expiratory volume in 1 second, TNM, and a multimodal approach as independent variables affecting long-term survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the overall poor prognosis of biphasic histology, a multimodal approach, including cancer-directed surgery, is associated with improved long-term results in very selected patients with Biph-MPM.
METHODS: A total of 213 patients with Biph-MPM treated at 4 tertiary centers who experienced MPM from January 2009 to December 2016 were selected, and clinical, pathologic, and surgical information was retrieved. A Cox regression model was used to identify predictors of survival, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to summarize overall survival.
RESULTS: The mean age and the male/female ratio were 68.4 ± 9.5 years and 5:1, respectively. Tumors were assigned to stages I (127, 59.6%), II (3, 1.4%), III (76, 35.4%), and IV (7, 3.3%) according to the Eighth Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) edition. A multimodal treatment including pleurectomy/decortication was performed in 58 patients (27.2%), chemotherapy alone in 99 patients (46.5%), and best supportive care in 56 (26.3%). The median overall survival was 11 months. A univariate analysis revealed that survival was significantly associated with the percentage forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P < .0001), performance status (P = .0002), multimodal treatment including surgery (P < .0001), and TNM stage (P = .011). A multivariable analysis confirmed performance status, percentage forced expiratory volume in 1 second, TNM, and a multimodal approach as independent variables affecting long-term survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the overall poor prognosis of biphasic histology, a multimodal approach, including cancer-directed surgery, is associated with improved long-term results in very selected patients with Biph-MPM.