European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2009
Effect of the removal of the Fallopian tube during hysterectomy on ovarian survival: the orphan ovary syndrome.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Repasy Istvan, Lendvai Viktor, Koppan Agnes, Bodis Jozsef, Koppan Miklos
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the long-term impact on ovarian survival of removing the Fallopian tube during hysterectomy.
STUDY DESIGN: We modified our standard operative policy by adding the option of removing the Fallopian tube, thus leaving an "orphan" ovary behind. In a follow-up study, we identified 82 patients who had undergone hysterectomy followed by a second operation for an adnexal condition. In 45 there was presence and in 37 there was absence of the Fallopian tube. Data analysis included the time interval between hysterectomy and the occurrence of adnexa-related complaints; diagnoses prior to and the type of the second surgery; histological diagnosis after and the success rate of the second surgery. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA on Ranks and the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test were used.
RESULTS: In 35.5% of patients with an intact Fallopian tube, hydrosalpinx developed. Cystic degeneration of orphan ovaries occurred significantly earlier than that of the "regular" adnexae group (50.0 months vs. 84.2 months, p=0.031). Laparotomy and laparoscopy for second surgery showed equal success rates.
CONCLUSION: Removal of the Fallopian tube at abdominal hysterectomy decreases the incidence of the development of pelvic masses later, but causes earlier cystic degeneration of the remaining ovaries.
STUDY DESIGN: We modified our standard operative policy by adding the option of removing the Fallopian tube, thus leaving an "orphan" ovary behind. In a follow-up study, we identified 82 patients who had undergone hysterectomy followed by a second operation for an adnexal condition. In 45 there was presence and in 37 there was absence of the Fallopian tube. Data analysis included the time interval between hysterectomy and the occurrence of adnexa-related complaints; diagnoses prior to and the type of the second surgery; histological diagnosis after and the success rate of the second surgery. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA on Ranks and the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test were used.
RESULTS: In 35.5% of patients with an intact Fallopian tube, hydrosalpinx developed. Cystic degeneration of orphan ovaries occurred significantly earlier than that of the "regular" adnexae group (50.0 months vs. 84.2 months, p=0.031). Laparotomy and laparoscopy for second surgery showed equal success rates.
CONCLUSION: Removal of the Fallopian tube at abdominal hysterectomy decreases the incidence of the development of pelvic masses later, but causes earlier cystic degeneration of the remaining ovaries.