MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000474527

Медицинская библиотека · European urology · 1997

A review of clinical studies of bropirimine immunotherapy of carcinoma in situ of the bladder and upper urinary tract.

Sarosdy M F

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Bropirimine has been shown to have activity against carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder in a previous phase-I trial. A review of three completed clinical trials as well as ongoing studies is presented to provide a current update.

METHODS

Details of the initial phase-I trial are reviewed, as are findings of a subsequent phase-II trial in bladder CIS and a multicenter study in upper tract CIS. All have used a dose of 3 g/day for 3 consecutive days each week, repeated weekly for up to 1 year. Cytology must be positive prior to treatment, and both biopsies and cytology must be negative after therapy for the patient to be considered a complete response.

RESULTS

In the phase-II trial in bladder CIS, 20 (61%) of 33 patients had a complete response. Responders included patients with prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy, uni- and multifocal CIS, and primary and secondary CIS. Responses were seen in 10 (48%) of 21 evaluable patients with upper tract CIS. Toxicities in both studies were manageable in most patients. Trials underway include bropirimine in BCG-failed CIS, a randomized comparison to BCG in previously untreated patients, and a trial of the two together.

CONCLUSION

Bropirimine does have activity against both bladder and upper tract CIS on the dose schedule used to date.

Для цитирования: Sarosdy M F. A review of clinical studies of bropirimine immunotherapy of carcinoma in situ of the bladder and upper urinary tract.. European urology. 1997. DOI: 10.1159/000474527.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.