Journal francais d'ophtalmologie · 2023
[Optical coherence tomography analysis of the optic nerve head and macula of the fellow eye in acute unilateral nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Attoui O, Castelain J, Chiquet C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to compare the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) of the fellow eyes of patients with acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION) to those of control subjects.
METHODS: This study included 46 patients with NAAION matched for age, sex and refraction data (spherical equivalent and/or axial length) to 46 control subjects. The anatomical parameters assessed using the Cirrus SD-OCT were the mean RNFL thickness, in the 4 quadrants (inferior, nasal, temporal, superior) and according to the 12 hourly meridians, GCC mean and in 6 quadrants centered on the fovea (infero-nasal, supero-nasal, infero-temporal, supero-temporal, superior and inferior) and parameters of the optic disc (Cup ratio - Vertical and Average Disc, Rim Area, Disc Area, Cup Volume).
RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the eyes contralateral to those affected by NAAION showed a greater value of the area of the neuro-retinal rim (rim area), and a smaller vertical cup/disc (C/D) ratio, mean C/D, and cup volume than the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups for peripapillary RNFL thickness and GCC parameters.
CONCLUSION: The absence of damage to the RNFL or GCC of the unaffected fellow eyes of patients with NAAION does not explain the perimetric damage. The eyes contralateral to those affected by NAAION are characterized by an overall size of the optic disc identical to those of the control subjects, but a smaller cup, a recognized risk factor for NAAION.
METHODS: This study included 46 patients with NAAION matched for age, sex and refraction data (spherical equivalent and/or axial length) to 46 control subjects. The anatomical parameters assessed using the Cirrus SD-OCT were the mean RNFL thickness, in the 4 quadrants (inferior, nasal, temporal, superior) and according to the 12 hourly meridians, GCC mean and in 6 quadrants centered on the fovea (infero-nasal, supero-nasal, infero-temporal, supero-temporal, superior and inferior) and parameters of the optic disc (Cup ratio - Vertical and Average Disc, Rim Area, Disc Area, Cup Volume).
RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the eyes contralateral to those affected by NAAION showed a greater value of the area of the neuro-retinal rim (rim area), and a smaller vertical cup/disc (C/D) ratio, mean C/D, and cup volume than the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups for peripapillary RNFL thickness and GCC parameters.
CONCLUSION: The absence of damage to the RNFL or GCC of the unaffected fellow eyes of patients with NAAION does not explain the perimetric damage. The eyes contralateral to those affected by NAAION are characterized by an overall size of the optic disc identical to those of the control subjects, but a smaller cup, a recognized risk factor for NAAION.