MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.56044

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Role of the Cerebellum in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review.

Tai Hina, Kandeel Nermien, Menon Maya, Ibrahim Andrew, Choo Byeongyeon, Santana Rochell, Jolayemi Ayodeji

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The aim of this systematic literature review was to investigate the role of the cerebellum in the affective symptoms observed in patients with bipolar disorder. The present systematic literature review included clinical studies conducted from 2013-2023 among adult populations with bipolar I and II disorders, along with their specifiers. With regard to cerebellar pathology, it was found that those with bipolar disorder performed worse than their healthy counterparts in their ability to comprehend the mental states of others and in identifying negative mental states. Additionally, individuals with bipolar disorder had reduced gray matter loss in regions such as lobules I-IX, crus I, and crus II, different functional activation patterns of the thalamus, striatum, and hippocampus on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and increased cortical thickness. Cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivities were altered in patients with bipolar disorder. The effects of lamotrigine and lithium on cerebellar volume and abnormalities are also discussed in this paper. The present systematic literature review illustrates the emerging involvement of the cerebellum in bipolar disorder and its affective symptoms and paves the way for future research and a better understanding of bipolar disorder.

Для цитирования: Tai Hina, Kandeel Nermien, Menon Maya, Ibrahim Andrew, Choo Byeongyeon, Santana Rochell, Jolayemi Ayodeji. Role of the Cerebellum in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56044.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.