MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.10.012

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2004

Utility of axillary ultrasound examination to select breast cancer patients suited for optimal sentinel node biopsy.

Sato Kazuhiko, Tamaki Kuniyoshi, Tsuda Hitoshi, Kosuda Shigeru, Kusano Shoichi, Hiraide Hoshio, Mochizuki Hidetaka

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Because sentinel node (SN) biopsy (SNB) is known to produce false-negative results, we examined the usefulness of axillary ultrasound (AUS) in selecting patients suitable for optimal SNB.

METHODS

A positive AUS finding (positive AUS) was defined as an echo pattern of a homogeneously hypoechoic SN without an echo-rich center, indicating massive to extensive nodal involvement. The identification of SNs was performed, and complete axillary dissection was carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 262 women were enrolled into the study (T1 disease = 94; T2 disease = 145; and T3 disease = 23). The incidence of positive AUS increased with increasing size of breast tumor (P <0.0001). The overall identification and false-negative rates were 88.2% and 10.8%, respectively. However, when limited to AUS-negative patients, SNs were identified in 205 of 208 patients (98.6%), and the false-negative rate was 1.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

AUS should be included in the preoperative procedure for the selection of breast cancer patients suitable for SNB.

Для цитирования: Sato Kazuhiko, Tamaki Kuniyoshi, Tsuda Hitoshi, Kosuda Shigeru, Kusano Shoichi, Hiraide Hoshio, Mochizuki Hidetaka. Utility of axillary ultrasound examination to select breast cancer patients suited for optimal sentinel node biopsy.. American journal of surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.10.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.