HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024
Prevalence, management and outcomes of pulmonary metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Emmamally Muhammad, Sobnach Sanju, Khan Rufaida, Kotze Urda, Bernon Marc, Sonderup Mark W, Spearman C Wendy, Jonas Eduard
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a significant global health burden, with varying survival rates across regions. The presence of pulmonary metastases (PM) in HCC predicts a poorer prognosis, yet the global understanding of the progression and management is limited.
METHODS: This study aims to systematically review the burden of PM in HCC, document current treatment approaches, and evaluate treatment effectiveness through meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Articles were screened, and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Statistical analyses were conducted to synthesise data and assess treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 82 articles were included, comprising a population of 3241 participants with documented PM. Our analysis revealed a linear relationship between the HCC population size and the occurrence of PM (p < 0.005). Surgical intervention demonstrated the lowest hazard ratio (0.128) and significantly improved survival rates compared to other treatment modalities. However, data quality limitations underscore the need for further research to delineate patient subsets benefitting from surgical intervention for PM.
CONCLUSION: Our findings advocate for continued investigation into PM management strategies, notably the role of surgical resection alongside systemic therapies, to improve outcomes in HCC patients with PM.
METHODS: This study aims to systematically review the burden of PM in HCC, document current treatment approaches, and evaluate treatment effectiveness through meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Articles were screened, and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Statistical analyses were conducted to synthesise data and assess treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 82 articles were included, comprising a population of 3241 participants with documented PM. Our analysis revealed a linear relationship between the HCC population size and the occurrence of PM (p < 0.005). Surgical intervention demonstrated the lowest hazard ratio (0.128) and significantly improved survival rates compared to other treatment modalities. However, data quality limitations underscore the need for further research to delineate patient subsets benefitting from surgical intervention for PM.
CONCLUSION: Our findings advocate for continued investigation into PM management strategies, notably the role of surgical resection alongside systemic therapies, to improve outcomes in HCC patients with PM.