Nuclear medicine communications · 2016
Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT versus contrast-enhanced CT alone for post-treatment detection of ovarian malignancy.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tawakol Ahmed, Abdelhafez Yasser G, Osama Amr, Hamada Emad, El Refaei Sherif
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of combined fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (Ce-CT) in comparison with Ce-CT alone for the detection of residual/recurrent tumor after initial treatment of malignant ovarian tumors.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study prospectively recruited 111 patients with a clinical suspicion of ovarian tumor recurrence. Each patient underwent F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) with low-dose CT, followed immediately by Ce-CT. Study-based analyses for a total of 136 scans were carried out. For each study, 11 subsites were assessed on a four-point score (score 0=definitely benign, score 1=probably benign, score 2=probably malignant, and score 3=definitely malignant). The subsites were collectively categorized into four groups: local tumor site, peritoneum, pelvi-abdominal lymph nodes, and other sites (e.g. liver, lung, bone, brain, etc). The final diagnosis of disease status was made on subsequent follow-up by conventional imaging (CT/MRI), F-FDG PET/CT, or histopathology whenever possible.
RESULTS: Of the 136 studies evaluated, 97 (71%) studies had recurrent/residual disease and 39 (29%) studies were disease free on the basis of the final diagnosis. F-FDG PET/Ce-CT and Ce-CT had a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 96 versus 84%, 92 versus 59%, 90 versus 59%, 97 versus 84%, and 95 versus 76%, respectively. F-FDG PET/Ce-CT was significantly more sensitive, specific, and accurate compared with Ce-CT, with P-values of 0.002, 0.001, and less than 0.0001, respectively. Site-based analyses also showed significant differences.
CONCLUSION: CombinedF-FDG PET/Ce-CT significantly outperforms Ce-CT alone in the post-treatment detection of malignant ovarian tumors.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study prospectively recruited 111 patients with a clinical suspicion of ovarian tumor recurrence. Each patient underwent F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) with low-dose CT, followed immediately by Ce-CT. Study-based analyses for a total of 136 scans were carried out. For each study, 11 subsites were assessed on a four-point score (score 0=definitely benign, score 1=probably benign, score 2=probably malignant, and score 3=definitely malignant). The subsites were collectively categorized into four groups: local tumor site, peritoneum, pelvi-abdominal lymph nodes, and other sites (e.g. liver, lung, bone, brain, etc). The final diagnosis of disease status was made on subsequent follow-up by conventional imaging (CT/MRI), F-FDG PET/CT, or histopathology whenever possible.
RESULTS: Of the 136 studies evaluated, 97 (71%) studies had recurrent/residual disease and 39 (29%) studies were disease free on the basis of the final diagnosis. F-FDG PET/Ce-CT and Ce-CT had a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 96 versus 84%, 92 versus 59%, 90 versus 59%, 97 versus 84%, and 95 versus 76%, respectively. F-FDG PET/Ce-CT was significantly more sensitive, specific, and accurate compared with Ce-CT, with P-values of 0.002, 0.001, and less than 0.0001, respectively. Site-based analyses also showed significant differences.
CONCLUSION: CombinedF-FDG PET/Ce-CT significantly outperforms Ce-CT alone in the post-treatment detection of malignant ovarian tumors.