European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014
PET/CT before autologous stem cell transplantation predicts outcome in refractory/relapsed follicular lymphoma.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alcantara Marion, Dupuis Jehan, Mareschal Sylvain, Julian Anne, Cottereau Anne Ségolène, Becker Stéphanie, Dubois Sydney, Oberic Lucie, Huynh Anne, Meignan Michel, Laurent Guy, Tilly Hervé, Haioun Corinne, Ysebaert Loïc
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Salvage of young patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) after R-CHOP includes salvage immunochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Previous studies dealing with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma have shown the prognostic value of PET/CT prior to ASCT.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 59 patients with refractory/relapsed FL after first-line R-CHOP who were chemosensitive (as evaluated by CT) to the salvage treatment and who proceeded to ASCT. The role of PET/CT in this setting to define chemosensitivity is not definitely established. So we focused on the prognostic value of PET/CT performed after salvage treatment, before ASCT.
RESULTS: The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 63.1% (50.9-78.3%) and 90.5% (82.8 - 98.8%), respectively, and did not differ significantly according to their Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index at relapse, conditioning regimen, or type of salvage. PFS was significantly lower in PET/CT-positive patients, according to the International Harmonization Project revised response criteria, with a 3-year PFS of 45.5% (26.6 - 77.8%) versus 72.6% (58.5 - 90.0%; p = 0.039). To better refine prognosis, we applied two types of throsholds: a Deauville five-point scale positive threshold of ≥3 (3-year PFS of 74.9%, range 61.0 - 92.1% %, versus 42.8%, range 24.7 - 74.4%; p = 0.02), and a ≥70% ∆SUVmax threshold between presalvage and pre-ASCT PET/CT (3-year PFS of 72.4%, range 57.5 - 91.3% versus 13.3%, 2.2 - 81.7%; p < 10(-3)). The PET/CT findings before ASCT were independently correlated with PFS in our series.
CONCLUSION: PET/CT negativity before ASCT is a desirable and achievable goal in the management of chemosensitive FL relapsing after first-line R-CHOP.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 59 patients with refractory/relapsed FL after first-line R-CHOP who were chemosensitive (as evaluated by CT) to the salvage treatment and who proceeded to ASCT. The role of PET/CT in this setting to define chemosensitivity is not definitely established. So we focused on the prognostic value of PET/CT performed after salvage treatment, before ASCT.
RESULTS: The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 63.1% (50.9-78.3%) and 90.5% (82.8 - 98.8%), respectively, and did not differ significantly according to their Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index at relapse, conditioning regimen, or type of salvage. PFS was significantly lower in PET/CT-positive patients, according to the International Harmonization Project revised response criteria, with a 3-year PFS of 45.5% (26.6 - 77.8%) versus 72.6% (58.5 - 90.0%; p = 0.039). To better refine prognosis, we applied two types of throsholds: a Deauville five-point scale positive threshold of ≥3 (3-year PFS of 74.9%, range 61.0 - 92.1% %, versus 42.8%, range 24.7 - 74.4%; p = 0.02), and a ≥70% ∆SUVmax threshold between presalvage and pre-ASCT PET/CT (3-year PFS of 72.4%, range 57.5 - 91.3% versus 13.3%, 2.2 - 81.7%; p < 10(-3)). The PET/CT findings before ASCT were independently correlated with PFS in our series.
CONCLUSION: PET/CT negativity before ASCT is a desirable and achievable goal in the management of chemosensitive FL relapsing after first-line R-CHOP.