Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026
Real-Time Characterization of Colonic Polyps: A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating the CAD-EYE System in Screening Colonoscopies.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maigné Marie, Saunier Maxime, Renaudeau Valentine, Dray Xavier, Guilloux Antoine, Cesbron-Métivier Elodie, Olivier Anne, Rahmi Gabriel, Perrod Guillaume, Samaha Elia, Smith Denis, Rullier Anne, Zerbib Frank, Benard Antoine, Berger Arthur
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Polypectomy-related costs could potentially be reduced through optical diagnosis strategies, such as "diagnose-and-leave" and "resect-and-discard." Artificial intelligence, using computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), may provide a reproducible optical diagnosis of colorectal lesions. This study aimed to assess the performance of the CAD-EYE system in the real-time characterization of colonic polyps.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, multicenter study evaluating the CAD-EYE system in patients undergoing screening colonoscopies at 5 French centers. CAD-EYE predictions and assessments by endoscopists (hyperplastic vs neoplastic) were compared with histopathology results. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of CAD-EYE for predicting neoplastic polyps, compared with the predefined threshold of 85%. The secondary outcomes were the specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, endoscopists' performance, and polyp detection rates.
RESULTS: Of 398 polyps analyzed, 343 were included in the primary analysis. CAD-EYE characterization was feasible in 96% of cases. The sensitivity was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.85), which failed to achieve the predefined threshold of 85% ( P = 0.064). The specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 0.79, 0.64, and 0.90, respectively. Performance was higher for diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (DRSPs). Endoscopists showed higher sensitivity than CAD-EYE (0.90 vs 0.80, P = 0.001). CAD-EYE-assisted colonoscopies detected more polyps per procedure (3.3 vs 2.3, P < 0.001) than endoscopists alone.
DISCUSSION: The performance of CAD-EYE was insufficient for the characterization of neoplastic colonic polyps. CAD-EYE performed better for DRSPs. AI seems to be beneficial for polyp detection.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, multicenter study evaluating the CAD-EYE system in patients undergoing screening colonoscopies at 5 French centers. CAD-EYE predictions and assessments by endoscopists (hyperplastic vs neoplastic) were compared with histopathology results. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of CAD-EYE for predicting neoplastic polyps, compared with the predefined threshold of 85%. The secondary outcomes were the specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, endoscopists' performance, and polyp detection rates.
RESULTS: Of 398 polyps analyzed, 343 were included in the primary analysis. CAD-EYE characterization was feasible in 96% of cases. The sensitivity was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.85), which failed to achieve the predefined threshold of 85% ( P = 0.064). The specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 0.79, 0.64, and 0.90, respectively. Performance was higher for diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (DRSPs). Endoscopists showed higher sensitivity than CAD-EYE (0.90 vs 0.80, P = 0.001). CAD-EYE-assisted colonoscopies detected more polyps per procedure (3.3 vs 2.3, P < 0.001) than endoscopists alone.
DISCUSSION: The performance of CAD-EYE was insufficient for the characterization of neoplastic colonic polyps. CAD-EYE performed better for DRSPs. AI seems to be beneficial for polyp detection.