Auris, nasus, larynx · 2021
A contemporary review of "realistic" success rates after surgical closure of nasal septal perforations.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lindemann Joerg, Goldberg-Bockhorn Eva, Scheithauer Marc O, Hoffmann Thomas K, Sommer Fabian, Stupp Franziska, Sieron Hannah L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The surgical closure of septal perforations is a challenging procedure. Various techniques exist. Each perforation proves that there is not the one precise procedure for all perforations. Nevertheless, success rates of about 90% are reported, although the procedure for closing the defect is challenging. Our goal was to evaluate the existing data.
METHODS: We performed a contemporary review of published closure rates of septal perforations on order to compare the present results in the literature. The limitations of the respective studies were analyzed.
RESULTS: We found closure rates from 30 to 100%. Numerous procedures were described and combined. Prospective studies comparing different techniques are missing. The follow-up time in studies was quite short or not even specified. Studies on long-term success rates are rare.
CONCLUSION: The closure of septal defects is one of the most challenging rhinosurgical interventions. Closure rates ≥90% as described in literature seem relatively high. One reason might be short follow-ups and retrospective study designs. Frequently, precise information on the follow-up and the method of follow up is missing. Thoroughly designed prospective studies are absent. Longer follow-up times are associated with lower complete closure rates. A long-term success rate between 70 and 80% seems realistic.
METHODS: We performed a contemporary review of published closure rates of septal perforations on order to compare the present results in the literature. The limitations of the respective studies were analyzed.
RESULTS: We found closure rates from 30 to 100%. Numerous procedures were described and combined. Prospective studies comparing different techniques are missing. The follow-up time in studies was quite short or not even specified. Studies on long-term success rates are rare.
CONCLUSION: The closure of septal defects is one of the most challenging rhinosurgical interventions. Closure rates ≥90% as described in literature seem relatively high. One reason might be short follow-ups and retrospective study designs. Frequently, precise information on the follow-up and the method of follow up is missing. Thoroughly designed prospective studies are absent. Longer follow-up times are associated with lower complete closure rates. A long-term success rate between 70 and 80% seems realistic.