MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000122

Медицинская библиотека · Nursing research · 2016

Nonoccupational Postexposure Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prophylaxis: Acceptance Following Sexual Assault.

Draughon Moret Jessica E, Hauda William E, Price Bonnie, Sheridan Daniel J

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) for HIV following sexual assault may decrease the likelihood of HIV transmission.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this exploratory chart review study was to examine factors associated with patients accepting post-sexual assault nPEP at three forensic nurse examiner programs in urban settings.

METHODS

Forensic nursing charts of patients presenting for acute sexual assault care were reviewed as part of a mixed-methods study.

RESULTS

Patients assaulted by more than one or an unknown number of assailants were over 12 times more likely to accept the offer of nPEP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 12.66, 95% CI [2.77, 57.82]). In cases where no condom was used (aOR = 8.57, 95% CI [1.59, 46.10]) or when any injury to the anus or genitalia was noted (aOR = 4.10, 95% CI [1.57, 10.75]), patients were more likely to accept nPEP. Patients with any injury to the face or head were less likely to initiate nPEP (aOR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.11, 0.97]).

DISCUSSION: This study is an important first step in understanding factors associated with nPEP acceptance after sexual assault.

Для цитирования: Draughon Moret Jessica E, Hauda William E, Price Bonnie, Sheridan Daniel J. Nonoccupational Postexposure Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prophylaxis: Acceptance Following Sexual Assault.. Nursing research. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000122.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.