Frontiers in oncology · 2026
PSMA PET-guided intensification of postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Geng, Shu Yuanyuan, Hong Jiaobao, Li Zhe, Yang Xiaohua
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is used to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy (SRT) and enable intensification through dose escalation and target modification. The oncologic benefit and safety profile of PSMA PET-guided intensification remain uncertain. We aimed to synthesize comparative and single-arm evidence on oncologic outcomes and toxicity of PSMA PET-guided intensification of postprostatectomy SRT.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 26 December 2025. Comparative and single-arm studies evaluating PSMA PET-guided intensification of postprostatectomy SRT were included. We included clinical studies using PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI to guide radiotherapy intensification and excluded preclinical studies and non-original reports. Primary outcomes were failure-free survival (FFS) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS). Secondary outcomes included metastasis- and survival-related endpoints, treatment escalation, and toxicity. Meta-analysis was conducted only when sufficient comparative data were available. Hazard ratios were pooled in RevMan 5.4.1 using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical significance was set at two-sided P<0.05.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, including five comparative and ten single-arm studies. Two studies reported FFS-type endpoints; because only two studies were available and endpoint definitions differed substantially, these findings were summarized descriptively. Four comparative studies involving 692 patients contributed to bRFS meta-analysis. PSMA PET-guided SRT showed numerically improved bRFS versus standard SRT, but the difference was not statistically significant (pooled HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.33-1.13; P = 0.12; I²=55%). Other secondary oncologic outcomes were variably reported with limited events and were synthesized descriptively. Severe genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity was uncommon, and some studies suggested delayed treatment escalation.
CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET-guided intensification of postprostatectomy SRT may improve biochemical control without an increase in severe toxicity; however, a statistically significant bRFS benefit was not demonstrated and evidence for other oncologic outcomes remains limited.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261277044.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 26 December 2025. Comparative and single-arm studies evaluating PSMA PET-guided intensification of postprostatectomy SRT were included. We included clinical studies using PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI to guide radiotherapy intensification and excluded preclinical studies and non-original reports. Primary outcomes were failure-free survival (FFS) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS). Secondary outcomes included metastasis- and survival-related endpoints, treatment escalation, and toxicity. Meta-analysis was conducted only when sufficient comparative data were available. Hazard ratios were pooled in RevMan 5.4.1 using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical significance was set at two-sided P<0.05.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, including five comparative and ten single-arm studies. Two studies reported FFS-type endpoints; because only two studies were available and endpoint definitions differed substantially, these findings were summarized descriptively. Four comparative studies involving 692 patients contributed to bRFS meta-analysis. PSMA PET-guided SRT showed numerically improved bRFS versus standard SRT, but the difference was not statistically significant (pooled HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.33-1.13; P = 0.12; I²=55%). Other secondary oncologic outcomes were variably reported with limited events and were synthesized descriptively. Severe genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity was uncommon, and some studies suggested delayed treatment escalation.
CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET-guided intensification of postprostatectomy SRT may improve biochemical control without an increase in severe toxicity; however, a statistically significant bRFS benefit was not demonstrated and evidence for other oncologic outcomes remains limited.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261277044.