Korean journal of radiology · 2025
Conversion of Mixed-Language Free-Text CT Reports of Pancreatic Cancer to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Structured Reporting Templates by Using GPT-4.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Hokun, Kim Bohyun, Choi Moon Hyung, Choi Joon-Il, Oh Soon Nam, Rha Sung Eun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of generative pre-trained transformer-4 (GPT-4) in generating structured reports (SRs) from mixed-language (English and Korean) narrative-style CT reports for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to assess its accuracy in categorizing PDCA resectability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive free-text reports of pancreas-protocol CT for staging PDAC, from two institutions, written in English or Korean from January 2021 to December 2023. Both the GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o models were provided prompts along with the free-text reports via an application programming interface and tasked with generating SRs and categorizing tumor resectability according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines version 2.2024. Prompts were optimized using the GPT-4 Turbo model and 50 reports from Institution B. The performances of the GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o models in the two tasks were evaluated using 115 reports from Institution A. Results were compared with a reference standard that was manually derived by an abdominal radiologist. Each report was consecutively processed three times, with the most frequent response selected as the final output. Error analysis was guided by the decision rationale provided by the models.
RESULTS: Of the 115 narrative reports tested, 96 (83.5%) contained both English and Korean. For SR generation, GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o demonstrated comparable accuracies (92.3% [1592/1725] and 92.2% [1590/1725], respectively; P = 0.923). In the resectability categorization, GPT-4 Turbo showed higher accuracy than GPT-4o (81.7% [94/115] vs. 67.0% [77/115], respectively; P = 0.002). In the error analysis of GPT-4 Turbo, the SR generation error rate was 7.7% (133/1725 items), which was primarily attributed to inaccurate data extraction (54.1% [72/133]). The resectability categorization error rate was 18.3% (21/115), with the main cause being violation of the resectability criteria (61.9% [13/21]).
CONCLUSION: Both GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o demonstrated acceptable accuracy in generating NCCN-based SRs on PDACs from mixed-language narrative reports. However, oversight by human radiologists is essential for determining resectability based on CT findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive free-text reports of pancreas-protocol CT for staging PDAC, from two institutions, written in English or Korean from January 2021 to December 2023. Both the GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o models were provided prompts along with the free-text reports via an application programming interface and tasked with generating SRs and categorizing tumor resectability according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines version 2.2024. Prompts were optimized using the GPT-4 Turbo model and 50 reports from Institution B. The performances of the GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o models in the two tasks were evaluated using 115 reports from Institution A. Results were compared with a reference standard that was manually derived by an abdominal radiologist. Each report was consecutively processed three times, with the most frequent response selected as the final output. Error analysis was guided by the decision rationale provided by the models.
RESULTS: Of the 115 narrative reports tested, 96 (83.5%) contained both English and Korean. For SR generation, GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o demonstrated comparable accuracies (92.3% [1592/1725] and 92.2% [1590/1725], respectively; P = 0.923). In the resectability categorization, GPT-4 Turbo showed higher accuracy than GPT-4o (81.7% [94/115] vs. 67.0% [77/115], respectively; P = 0.002). In the error analysis of GPT-4 Turbo, the SR generation error rate was 7.7% (133/1725 items), which was primarily attributed to inaccurate data extraction (54.1% [72/133]). The resectability categorization error rate was 18.3% (21/115), with the main cause being violation of the resectability criteria (61.9% [13/21]).
CONCLUSION: Both GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-4o demonstrated acceptable accuracy in generating NCCN-based SRs on PDACs from mixed-language narrative reports. However, oversight by human radiologists is essential for determining resectability based on CT findings.