Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2015
The validity of ultrasonography in predicting the outcomes of labour induction.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alvarez-Colomo Cristina, Gobernado-Tejedor Julio Alberto
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To analyse the validity of ultrasonography in predicting the outcomes of labour induction, compared with Bishop score (BS), and to design a predictive model including ultrasound and clinical variables.
METHODS: In this prospective, observational study of 151 women who underwent induction of labour, an endovaginal ultrasound was performed to determine cervical length (CL), the wedging pattern and the presence of dilatation and funnel. Foetal head-perineum distance (FHPD) was measured by transperineal ultrasound. Vaginal examination was performed to calculate BS and to determine whether cervical ripening was needed. The outcome variable was the method of delivery.
RESULTS: Caesarean section was performed in 30.5 % of cases. CL (26.1 vs. 31.4) and FHPD (44.7 vs. 51.3) were lower in the vaginal delivery group. The area under the curve obtained for FHPD (0.734) was greatest, followed by CL (0.663) and BS (0.678). The proposed model resulted in correct predictions in 82.8 % of cases, with 15 % false positives.
CONCLUSIONS: The FHPD and the CL are useful in predicting the result of the induction labour comparable to Bishop score. Using ultrasound scan is significantly better tolerated than vaginal exam. The predictive model selects women who undergo induction having a risk of caesarean section equivalent to spontaneous delivery.
METHODS: In this prospective, observational study of 151 women who underwent induction of labour, an endovaginal ultrasound was performed to determine cervical length (CL), the wedging pattern and the presence of dilatation and funnel. Foetal head-perineum distance (FHPD) was measured by transperineal ultrasound. Vaginal examination was performed to calculate BS and to determine whether cervical ripening was needed. The outcome variable was the method of delivery.
RESULTS: Caesarean section was performed in 30.5 % of cases. CL (26.1 vs. 31.4) and FHPD (44.7 vs. 51.3) were lower in the vaginal delivery group. The area under the curve obtained for FHPD (0.734) was greatest, followed by CL (0.663) and BS (0.678). The proposed model resulted in correct predictions in 82.8 % of cases, with 15 % false positives.
CONCLUSIONS: The FHPD and the CL are useful in predicting the result of the induction labour comparable to Bishop score. Using ultrasound scan is significantly better tolerated than vaginal exam. The predictive model selects women who undergo induction having a risk of caesarean section equivalent to spontaneous delivery.