MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jog.13806

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2018

An exceptional uterine inversion in a virgo patient affected by submucosal leiomyoma: Case report and review of the literature.

Della Corte Luigi, Giampaolino Pierluigi, Fabozzi Annamaria, Di Spiezio Sardo Attilio, Bifulco Giuseppe

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Inversion of the uterus is quite a rare obstetric (puerperal) or gynecological (non-puerperal) condition. Non-puerperal type may be benign or malign mass induced or idiopathic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case with a large review of literature of uterine inversion in a patient without sexual experience. We report the case of a 52-year-old, unmarried virgo woman, affected by schizophrenia, was referred to our emergency room for evidence of a mass outside of the vaginal introitus, combined with vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. The patient underwent vaginal myoma resection and abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy. The diagnosis of uterine inversion was confirmed during operation. Diagnosis of uterine inversion is often not easy and imaging studies might be helpful. Despite the rarity, uterine non-puerperal inversion is possible: for this reason, it is necessary to perform appropriate, conservative treatment, especially in women affected by benign myomas and with a desire for pregnancy.

Для цитирования: Della Corte Luigi, Giampaolino Pierluigi, Fabozzi Annamaria, Di Spiezio Sardo Attilio, Bifulco Giuseppe. An exceptional uterine inversion in a virgo patient affected by submucosal leiomyoma: Case report and review of the literature.. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2018. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13806.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.