Translational vision science & technology · 2025
The Effect of Contrast Reversal on Peripheral Visual Acuity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cassanello Carlos R, Roach Neil W, Scholes Chris, McGraw Paul V
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Patients with central vision loss must rely upon regions of their unaffected peripheral retina to carry out fine-scale visual tasks. We aimed to determine the conditions under which contrast reversal of targets and/or backgrounds may act to improve visual acuity in the peripheral field.
METHODS: Ten participants with normal or corrected-to-normal vision performed a visual acuity task in which they were asked to identify the orientation of a letter-C target presented at 10° in the right visual field. Minimum letter size thresholds were measured for static (black or white) and contrast-reversing (8.5 or 17 Hz) targets presented on a uniform mean luminance background, a static patterned background, or a dynamic version of the patterned background, which was contrast reversing at the same temporal frequencies used for the targets.
RESULTS: When presented on a uniform background, black targets produced lower thresholds than white targets, and there was no consistent benefit of contrast reversal. However, when presented on a patterned background, acuity for contrast-reversing targets consistently exceeded that for either polarity static target. Contrast reversing the background also improved acuity, for both static targets and targets that contrast reversed at a different rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral visual acuity is significantly enhanced by dynamic contrast modulation, particularly when the modulation acts to promote segmentation between target and background.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Adding temporal modulation to the target or background could provide a simple way of enhancing peripheral acuity for patients with central vision loss.
METHODS: Ten participants with normal or corrected-to-normal vision performed a visual acuity task in which they were asked to identify the orientation of a letter-C target presented at 10° in the right visual field. Minimum letter size thresholds were measured for static (black or white) and contrast-reversing (8.5 or 17 Hz) targets presented on a uniform mean luminance background, a static patterned background, or a dynamic version of the patterned background, which was contrast reversing at the same temporal frequencies used for the targets.
RESULTS: When presented on a uniform background, black targets produced lower thresholds than white targets, and there was no consistent benefit of contrast reversal. However, when presented on a patterned background, acuity for contrast-reversing targets consistently exceeded that for either polarity static target. Contrast reversing the background also improved acuity, for both static targets and targets that contrast reversed at a different rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral visual acuity is significantly enhanced by dynamic contrast modulation, particularly when the modulation acts to promote segmentation between target and background.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Adding temporal modulation to the target or background could provide a simple way of enhancing peripheral acuity for patients with central vision loss.