Neurosurgery · 2007
Cavernous hemangioma of the third cranial nerve: case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Itshayek Eyal, Perez-Sanchez Xicotencatl, Cohen Jose E, Umansky Felix, Spektor Sergey
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The authors report a rare case of a cavernous hemangioma (CH) involving the third cranial nerve.
CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old Caucasian woman presented with neuralgic facial pain that responded to pharmacological management. She had no neurological deficit. Magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed a space-occupying lesion in the interpeduncular cistern with no evidence of hemorrhagic event. Preoperative cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples were negative for cytology and tumor markers.
INTERVENTION: The patient underwent craniotomy and exploration of the interpeduncular cistern. A lesion with the raspberry-like appearance characteristic of a CH was found emerging from between the fibers and completely encircling Cranial Nerve III. The surgeon decided to leave the lesion in place to avoid creation of a new neurological deficit in the young patient. The patient is asymptomatic with a stable radiological picture 18 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: CH should be considered as a possible differential diagnosis of extra-axial space-occupying lesions along the course of the cranial nerves. Resection with resulting deficit may not be indicated in patients presenting with normal neurological function. Further research and longer follow-up periods are required to better understand the natural history of CH involving the cranial nerves.
CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old Caucasian woman presented with neuralgic facial pain that responded to pharmacological management. She had no neurological deficit. Magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed a space-occupying lesion in the interpeduncular cistern with no evidence of hemorrhagic event. Preoperative cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples were negative for cytology and tumor markers.
INTERVENTION: The patient underwent craniotomy and exploration of the interpeduncular cistern. A lesion with the raspberry-like appearance characteristic of a CH was found emerging from between the fibers and completely encircling Cranial Nerve III. The surgeon decided to leave the lesion in place to avoid creation of a new neurological deficit in the young patient. The patient is asymptomatic with a stable radiological picture 18 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: CH should be considered as a possible differential diagnosis of extra-axial space-occupying lesions along the course of the cranial nerves. Resection with resulting deficit may not be indicated in patients presenting with normal neurological function. Further research and longer follow-up periods are required to better understand the natural history of CH involving the cranial nerves.