International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
Fertility and anatomical outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: An 11-year retrospective cohort study to validate a new classification system for intrauterine adhesions (Urman-Vitale Classification System).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Urman Bulent, Yakin Kayhan, Ertas Sinem, Alper Ebru, Aksakal Ece, Riemma Gaetano, Angioni Stefano, Vitale Salvatore Giovanni
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To propose a new classification system (Urman-Vitale Classification System) for intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) and to evaluate anatomical and fertility outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis accordingly.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated over 11 years by a single operator in a tertiary care hospital. Women with sonographic suspicion of IUAs were scheduled for hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysteroscopy for confirmation and treatment. IUAs were divided into five classes according to symptoms, ultrasound, HSG findings, and postsurgical hysteroscopic appearance. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed using a bipolar cutting electrode in an office setting. Evaluated outcomes were restoration of the uterine cavity, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth rates.
RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (479 procedures) were included. Mean number of hysteroscopies increased in frequency with class of adhesions from Class 1 to Class 5 (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 2.3 ± 0.5; P = 0.001). Full restoration of the cavity was achieved in 100% of patients with Class 1 compared with 18.5% for Class 5 (43/43 vs 5/27; P = 0.001). Clinical pregnancy (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.034; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 5: P = 0.024) and live birth (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.001; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 4: P = 0.007; 2 vs 5: P = 0.0208) rates decreased with increasing severity of IUAs. Pregnancy loss rate was related to IUA severity (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.012; 1 vs 5: P = 0.003: 2 vs 4: P = 0.014; 2 vs 5: P = 0.021).
CONCLUSION: A classification based on symptoms, imaging findings, and postsurgical macroscopic appearance of the uterine cavity could be useful in predicting prognosis and fertility in women with IUAs.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated over 11 years by a single operator in a tertiary care hospital. Women with sonographic suspicion of IUAs were scheduled for hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysteroscopy for confirmation and treatment. IUAs were divided into five classes according to symptoms, ultrasound, HSG findings, and postsurgical hysteroscopic appearance. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed using a bipolar cutting electrode in an office setting. Evaluated outcomes were restoration of the uterine cavity, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth rates.
RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (479 procedures) were included. Mean number of hysteroscopies increased in frequency with class of adhesions from Class 1 to Class 5 (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 2.3 ± 0.5; P = 0.001). Full restoration of the cavity was achieved in 100% of patients with Class 1 compared with 18.5% for Class 5 (43/43 vs 5/27; P = 0.001). Clinical pregnancy (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.034; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 5: P = 0.024) and live birth (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.001; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 4: P = 0.007; 2 vs 5: P = 0.0208) rates decreased with increasing severity of IUAs. Pregnancy loss rate was related to IUA severity (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.012; 1 vs 5: P = 0.003: 2 vs 4: P = 0.014; 2 vs 5: P = 0.021).
CONCLUSION: A classification based on symptoms, imaging findings, and postsurgical macroscopic appearance of the uterine cavity could be useful in predicting prognosis and fertility in women with IUAs.