Influence of Cholecystokinin-8 on Compound Nerve Action Potentials from Ventral Gastric Vagus in Rats.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) has shown great promise as a potential therapy for a number of conditions, such as epilepsy, depression and for Neurometabolic Therapies, especially for treating obesity. The objective of this study was to characterize the left ventral subdiaphragmatic gastric trunk of vagus nerve (SubDiaGVN) and to analyze the influence of intravenous injection of gut hormone cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) on compound nerve action potential (CNAP) observed on the same branch, with the aim of understanding the impact of hormones on VNS and incorporating the methods and results into closed loop implant design.
METHODS
The cervical region of the left vagus nerve (CerVN) of male Wistar rats was stimulated with electric current and the elicited CNAPs were recorded on the SubDiaGVN under four different conditions: Control (no injection), Saline, CCK1 (100[Formula: see text]pmol/kg) and CCK2 (1000[Formula: see text]pmol/kg) injections.
RESULTS
We identified the presence of A[Formula: see text], B, C1, C2, C3 and C4 fibers with their respective velocity ranges. Intravenous administration of CCK in vivo results in selective, statistically significant reduction of CNAP components originating from A and B fibers, but with no discernible effect on the C fibers in [Formula: see text] animals. The affected CNAP components exhibit statistically significant ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) higher normalized stimulation thresholds.
CONCLUSION
This approach of characterizing the vagus nerve can be used in closed loop systems to determine when to initiate VNS and also to tune the stimulation dose, which is patient-specific and changes over time.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.