Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
A new method for monitoring abnormal muscle response in hemifacial spasm: A prospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Seunghoon, Park Sang-Ku, Lee Jeong-A, Joo Byung-Euk, Kong Doo-Sik, Seo Dae-Won, Park Kwan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine a new abnormal muscle response (AMR) monitoring method during microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm.
METHODS: 486 patients with hemifacial spasm were monitored for an AMR during MVD with a new method involving preoperative mapping and intraoperative centrifugal stimulation of the facial nerve. For the last 62 patients, we performed the AMR monitoring using both, the new and conventional methods simultaneously.
RESULTS: Preoperative facial nerve mapping showed that the maximal AMR was detected most frequently (66.9%) at the "F" location (the direction towards the frontalis muscle). An intraoperative AMR was observed in 86.2% of the patients, which disappeared after MVD in 96.4% of the patients. A comparison of the new and conventional methods respectively showed that AMR disappearance after MVD was observed in 98.2% and 61.8% of the patients, no AMR in 0% and 9.1%, and persistent AMR after MVD in 1.8% and 29.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: The new AMR monitoring method demonstrated greater AMR monitoring efficacy and supports the finding that disappearance of an AMR is a good indicator of effective decompression during MVD surgery.
SIGNIFICANCE: Preoperative mapping and intraoperative centrifugal stimulation of the facial nerve during MVD surgery in HFS patients showed greater efficacy of AMR monitoring.
METHODS: 486 patients with hemifacial spasm were monitored for an AMR during MVD with a new method involving preoperative mapping and intraoperative centrifugal stimulation of the facial nerve. For the last 62 patients, we performed the AMR monitoring using both, the new and conventional methods simultaneously.
RESULTS: Preoperative facial nerve mapping showed that the maximal AMR was detected most frequently (66.9%) at the "F" location (the direction towards the frontalis muscle). An intraoperative AMR was observed in 86.2% of the patients, which disappeared after MVD in 96.4% of the patients. A comparison of the new and conventional methods respectively showed that AMR disappearance after MVD was observed in 98.2% and 61.8% of the patients, no AMR in 0% and 9.1%, and persistent AMR after MVD in 1.8% and 29.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: The new AMR monitoring method demonstrated greater AMR monitoring efficacy and supports the finding that disappearance of an AMR is a good indicator of effective decompression during MVD surgery.
SIGNIFICANCE: Preoperative mapping and intraoperative centrifugal stimulation of the facial nerve during MVD surgery in HFS patients showed greater efficacy of AMR monitoring.