Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2019
Measurement of urinary free cortisol by LC-MS-MS: adoption of a literature reference range and comparison with our current immunometric method.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bianchi L, Campi B, Sessa M R, De Marco G, Ferrarini E, Zucchi R, Marcocci C, Vitti P, Manetti L, Saba A, Agretti P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: One of the best indicators of adrenal gland dysfunction is the level of free cortisol measured in the 24-h urine (UFC) which faithfully reflects the level of biologically active serum cortisol not subjected to circadian variations. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) is a sensitive, accurate and precise method recently available in routine laboratories that could remedy interference problems of immunoassays.
METHODS: In this study, a literature reference range for UFC measured by LC-MS-MS was verified, and UFC values measured by LC-MS-MS and immunoassay were compared. Immunometric UFC measurement was performed by ACCESS CORTISOL assay without preliminary extraction, using Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 600 highly automated platform. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry UFC measurement was performed by a home-made validated method using cortisol-D4 as internal standard with preliminary deproteinization of urinary samples by centrifugal filter and injection on reverse-phase column. Cortisol was analyzed in positive ion mode with an ESI interface.
RESULTS: The reference interval from literature (11-70 μg/day) was confirmed by results obtained for healthy study group. Comparison study of the two methods highlighted a constant and proportional systematic error with a general tendency to overestimate results for the in-use method.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the direct immunometric method overestimates UFC results with respect to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry which represents the reference method. The literature reference range 11-70 μg/day was confirmed and can be adopted by our lab that will shift all UFC tests performed in routine to the mass spectrometry-based method, satisfying clinicians' request.
METHODS: In this study, a literature reference range for UFC measured by LC-MS-MS was verified, and UFC values measured by LC-MS-MS and immunoassay were compared. Immunometric UFC measurement was performed by ACCESS CORTISOL assay without preliminary extraction, using Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 600 highly automated platform. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry UFC measurement was performed by a home-made validated method using cortisol-D4 as internal standard with preliminary deproteinization of urinary samples by centrifugal filter and injection on reverse-phase column. Cortisol was analyzed in positive ion mode with an ESI interface.
RESULTS: The reference interval from literature (11-70 μg/day) was confirmed by results obtained for healthy study group. Comparison study of the two methods highlighted a constant and proportional systematic error with a general tendency to overestimate results for the in-use method.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the direct immunometric method overestimates UFC results with respect to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry which represents the reference method. The literature reference range 11-70 μg/day was confirmed and can be adopted by our lab that will shift all UFC tests performed in routine to the mass spectrometry-based method, satisfying clinicians' request.