Journal of health psychology · 2026
Classification and regression tree analysis to understand theory-aligned barriers to glucose self-monitoring behaviors among insulin-using type 2 diabetes patients without continuous glucose monitors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
JaKa Meghan M, Gustafson Sally K, Dinh Jennifer M, Johnson Mary L, Asche Steve E, Dunnigan Sean, Maciosek Michael V, Ziegenfuss Jeanette Y, Haven Alyse L, Bergenstal Richard M, Martens Thomas W
Аннотация
Glucose self-monitoring is critical for type 2 diabetes management among patients using insulin. Combining behavior change theory with classification and regression tree (CART) is a novel data-driven approach to identifying barriers to self-monitoring. Baseline data from non-CGM-using patients in The GluCoCare Study were used to describe barriers to self-monitoring and use of data to inform diabetes self-care (N = 360). Patterns of barriers that predicted self-monitoring or use of self-monitoring data were also identified. Results showed barriers to self-monitoring were present in each of three Behavior Change Wheel categories: capability (e.g. procedural knowledge), opportunity (e.g. social support), and motivation (e.g. guilt). One example of a CART-identified pattern that predicted high self-monitoring was low guilt, high belief about importance of self-monitoring, low skin irritation, and high procedural knowledge. Future studies should test whether promoting these determinant patterns by addressing specific barriers leads to more self-monitoring and better outcomes.