Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025
A novel case of glial transdifferentiation in renal medullary carcinoma brain metastasis.
СтатьяКлинический случайПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gubbiotti Maria A, McCutcheon Ian E, Rao Priya, Genovese Giannicola, Wang Linghua, Tarasov Artem, Putintsev Vladislav, Berlinski Amber, Stupichev Danil, Kriukov Kirill, Davitavyan Suren, Salem Basim, Sarachakov Alexander, Lebedev Dmitry, Hensley Michael, Bagaev Alexander, Paradiso Francesca, Kushnarev Vladimir, Khegai Gleb, Tannir Nizar M, Msaouel Pavlos
Аннотация
Renal medullary carcinoma is a rare undifferentiated tumor of the kidney associated with sickle cell trait and characterized by INI1 (SMARCB1) loss. Although metastasis to lungs, lymph nodes, and bone is commonly reported, distant spread to the central nervous system almost never occurs. Here we present an unusual case of a patient with renal medullary carcinoma with metastasis to the brain following treatment which included tazemetostat, an EZH2 inhibitor. The metastatic brain lesion harbored morphologic, immunohistochemical, and methylation profile supportive of a primary CNS phenotype with loss of the trimethylated lysine 27 residue of histone 3 while maintaining INI1 loss and a specific gene fusion shared with the patient's tumor prior to initiation of tazemetostat therapy. Therefore, given the common genetic signatures in the brain metastasis and the patient's prior tumor, this case represents a rare event of glial transdifferentiation in a brain metastasis of renal medullary carcinoma following the use of an epigenetic modulator. As renal medullary carcinoma has been known to cleverly utilize adaptive mechanisms for survival, we propose that such cell plasticity seen in this case may have been provoked by the use of a drug that alters the epigenetic signature of the tumor cells. Thus, careful assessment of tumor biology following novel therapeutic treatment options must be performed in order to note such unexpected consequences of treatment.