Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed · 1995
Clinical distinction between acute hemorrhagic and acute ischemic stroke by Siriraj stroke score.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hung L Y, Wang P Y, Wang Y, Chia L G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The clinical distinction between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke cannot be achieved by simple clinical evaluation, and it is impossible to submit all stroke patients to computed tomography. A simple, reliable, and safe diagnostic tool for acute stroke syndrome is needed. This study tested the Siriraj stroke score to verify its accuracy for distinguishing among the pathological subtypes of stroke.
METHODS: This study included the one hundred and seventy-one patients with acute supratentorial stroke syndromes consecutively admitted to the Emergency Room of the Taichung Veterans General Hospital from April 1 to September 30, 1993. The Siriraj stroke score was calculated, then compared with results of computed tomography. The Siriraj stroke score was calculated as (2.5 x level of consciousness) + (2 x vomiting) + (2 x headache) + (0.1 x diastolic blood pressure) - (3 x atheroma markers) - 12. A score above 1 indicates supratentorial intracranial hemorrhage, while a score below -1 indicates infarction. The score between 1 and -1 represents an equivocal result needing further evaluation to verify diagnosis.
RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivities of the Siriraj stroke score for intracranial hemorrhage and infarction were 85% and 90% respectively, with an overall predictive accuracy of 88.5%. When three cases with subarachnoid hemorrhage whose scores were all above 1 were excluded, the sensitivities for cerebral hemorrhage and infarction were 83.8% and 90% respectively, with an overall predictive accuracy of 88.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Siriraj stroke score can be used as a reliable bedside method for diagnosing acute stroke and for deciding which patients should have priority for computed tomography, it is also a valuable tool for epidemiology studies of stroke incidence and outcome.
METHODS: This study included the one hundred and seventy-one patients with acute supratentorial stroke syndromes consecutively admitted to the Emergency Room of the Taichung Veterans General Hospital from April 1 to September 30, 1993. The Siriraj stroke score was calculated, then compared with results of computed tomography. The Siriraj stroke score was calculated as (2.5 x level of consciousness) + (2 x vomiting) + (2 x headache) + (0.1 x diastolic blood pressure) - (3 x atheroma markers) - 12. A score above 1 indicates supratentorial intracranial hemorrhage, while a score below -1 indicates infarction. The score between 1 and -1 represents an equivocal result needing further evaluation to verify diagnosis.
RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivities of the Siriraj stroke score for intracranial hemorrhage and infarction were 85% and 90% respectively, with an overall predictive accuracy of 88.5%. When three cases with subarachnoid hemorrhage whose scores were all above 1 were excluded, the sensitivities for cerebral hemorrhage and infarction were 83.8% and 90% respectively, with an overall predictive accuracy of 88.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Siriraj stroke score can be used as a reliable bedside method for diagnosing acute stroke and for deciding which patients should have priority for computed tomography, it is also a valuable tool for epidemiology studies of stroke incidence and outcome.