Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Allen Sophie, Loong Lucy, Garrett Alice, Torr Bethany, Durkie Miranda, Drummond James, Callaway Alison, Robinson Rachel, Burghel George J, Hanson Helen, Field Joanne, McDevitt Trudi, McVeigh Terri P, Bedenham Tina, Bowles Christopher, Bradshaw Kirsty, Brooks Claire, Butler Samantha, Del Rey Jimenez Juan Carlos, Hawkes Lorraine, Stinton Victoria, MacMahon Suzanne, Owens Martina, Palmer-Smith Sheila, Smith Kenneth, Tellez James, Valganon-Petrizan Mikel, Waskiewicz Erik, Yau Michael, Eccles Diana M, Tischkowitz Marc, Goel Shilpi, McRonald Fiona, Antoniou Antonis C, Morris Eva, Hardy Steven, Turnbull Clare
Аннотация
METHODS: In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4).
RESULTS: Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored.
CONCLUSION: The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.