MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jmg-2023-109645

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical genetics · 2024

Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey.

Allen Sophie, Loong Lucy, Garrett Alice, Torr Bethany, Durkie Miranda, Drummond James, Callaway Alison, Robinson Rachel, Burghel George J, Hanson Helen, Field Joanne, McDevitt Trudi, McVeigh Terri P, Bedenham Tina, Bowles Christopher, Bradshaw Kirsty, Brooks Claire, Butler Samantha, Del Rey Jimenez Juan Carlos, Hawkes Lorraine, Stinton Victoria, MacMahon Suzanne, Owens Martina, Palmer-Smith Sheila, Smith Kenneth, Tellez James, Valganon-Petrizan Mikel, Waskiewicz Erik, Yau Michael, Eccles Diana M, Tischkowitz Marc, Goel Shilpi, McRonald Fiona, Antoniou Antonis C, Morris Eva, Hardy Steven, Turnbull Clare

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

National and international amalgamation of genomic data offers opportunity for research and audit, including analyses enabling improved classification of variants of uncertain significance. Review of individual-level data from National Health Service (NHS) testing of cancer susceptibility genes (2002-2023) submitted to the National Disease Registration Service revealed heterogeneity across participating laboratories regarding (1) the structure, quality and completeness of submitted data, and (2) the ease with which that data could be assembled locally for submission.

METHODS

In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4).

RESULTS

Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored.

CONCLUSION

The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.

Для цитирования: Allen Sophie, Loong Lucy, Garrett Alice, Torr Bethany, Durkie Miranda, Drummond James, Callaway Alison, Robinson Rachel, Burghel George J, Hanson Helen, Field Joanne, McDevitt Trudi, McVeigh Terri P, Bedenham Tina, Bowles Christopher, Bradshaw Kirsty, Brooks Claire, Butler Samantha, Del Rey Jimenez Juan Carlos, Hawkes Lorraine, Stinton Victoria, MacMahon Suzanne, Owens Martina, Palmer-Smith Sheila, Smith Kenneth, Tellez James, Valganon-Petrizan Mikel, Waskiewicz Erik, Yau Michael, Eccles Diana M, Tischkowitz Marc, Goel Shilpi, McRonald Fiona, Antoniou Antonis C, Morris Eva, Hardy Steven, Turnbull Clare. Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey.. Journal of medical genetics. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109645.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.