Journal of thoracic imaging · 2016
Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Metastatic Malignant Pleural Thickening.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
İnan Nagihan, Sarisoy Hasan T, Çam İsa, Sakçi Zakir, Arslan Arzu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Imaging plays a critical role not only in detection but also in characterization of pleural thickening as benign or malignant. The aim of the study was to investigate the value of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and metastatic malignant pleural thickening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 64 pleural foci of nodular thickening (47 metastatic malignant and 17 benign) were included in this prospective study. DW imaging was performed using a breath-hold single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence. Two different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC1,2) maps were obtained with different b factors (ADC1 reconstructed from b factors of 0 and 650 mm/s and ADC2 reconstructed from b factors of 0 and 1000 mm/s), and ADCs were calculated. Quantitatively, ADCs were compared between the groups, and the optimal cutoff value was found by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: Quantitatively, differences in signal intensities on DW trace images with b factors of 650 and 1000 mm/s were not statistically significant. The ADC1 and ADC2 of the metastatic malignant thickening were significantly lower than those of benign ones [mean ADC1 was 1.37±0.65×10 mm/s for metastatic malignant thickening and 2.11±0.69×10 mm/s for benign thickening (P=0.045); ADC2 was 1.06±0.56×10 mm/s for metastatic malignant thickening and 1.56±0.71×10 mm/s for benign thickening (P=0.038)]. However, because of the ADC overlap between malignant and benign disease, a sufficiently discriminative cutoff value could not be defined by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
CONCLUSION: Despite fair sensitivity and specificity, DW imaging may serve as a complementary tool that improves the differential diagnosis of pleural thickening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 64 pleural foci of nodular thickening (47 metastatic malignant and 17 benign) were included in this prospective study. DW imaging was performed using a breath-hold single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence. Two different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC1,2) maps were obtained with different b factors (ADC1 reconstructed from b factors of 0 and 650 mm/s and ADC2 reconstructed from b factors of 0 and 1000 mm/s), and ADCs were calculated. Quantitatively, ADCs were compared between the groups, and the optimal cutoff value was found by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: Quantitatively, differences in signal intensities on DW trace images with b factors of 650 and 1000 mm/s were not statistically significant. The ADC1 and ADC2 of the metastatic malignant thickening were significantly lower than those of benign ones [mean ADC1 was 1.37±0.65×10 mm/s for metastatic malignant thickening and 2.11±0.69×10 mm/s for benign thickening (P=0.045); ADC2 was 1.06±0.56×10 mm/s for metastatic malignant thickening and 1.56±0.71×10 mm/s for benign thickening (P=0.038)]. However, because of the ADC overlap between malignant and benign disease, a sufficiently discriminative cutoff value could not be defined by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
CONCLUSION: Despite fair sensitivity and specificity, DW imaging may serve as a complementary tool that improves the differential diagnosis of pleural thickening.