MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Anticancer research · 2010

Epithelial versus endothelial CEACAM1 expression and angiogenesis in epididymal adenomatoid tumor.

Kilic Nerbil, Tilki Derya, Ergün Babek, Seitz Michael, Stief Christian G, Reich Oliver, Ergün Süleyman

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: To study the expression of the pro-angiogenic factor carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule-1 (CEACAM1) in epididymal adeno-matoid tumor tissue, a very rare benign neoplasia, in relation to its vascularization.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for CEACAM1 and for both endothelial markers CD31 and CD34 was performed in normal human epididymal and epididymal adenomatoid tumor tissue. The vessel density was calculated in four tumor regions with different degrees of vascularization in comparison to the vascularization of the normal epididymal tissue.

RESULTS

CEACAM1 was found in normal epididymal epithelium, while the epithelium of tumor glands was mostly negative. Only few blood vessels and lymphatics in adenomatoid tumor tissue expressed CEACAM1. The assessment of vascularization revealed either equal or a significantly lower vessel density in some adenomatoid tumor regions in comparison to normal epididymal tissue.

DISCUSSION: These data demonstrate that despite its epithelial down-regulation, CEACAM1 is not present in the majority of adenomatoid tumor blood vessels, which might be related to the lower angiogenic activity and benign behaviour of this tumor.

Для цитирования: Kilic Nerbil, Tilki Derya, Ergün Babek, Seitz Michael, Stief Christian G, Reich Oliver, Ergün Süleyman. Epithelial versus endothelial CEACAM1 expression and angiogenesis in epididymal adenomatoid tumor.. Anticancer research. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.