Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2019
Evaluation of the Parameter "Mean Impedance" for Representing Eustachian tube Functions During Pressure Increase and Decrease in Pressure Chamber Measurements.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schwarz David, Jansen Stefanie, Steinhauser Susanne, Meyer Moritz F
Аннотация
HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis of the study is that the mean impedance (MI) during compression and decompression provides additional information of the Eustachian tube (ET) function.
BACKGROUND: The continuous impedance measurement in a pressure chamber can provide valuable information about the opening function of the ET.
METHODS: Around 55 ear-healthy volunteers were examined in a pressure chamber. These were subjected to a decompression phase and a compression phase. The pressure change was constantly 20 kPa/min. Using evaluation software, the MI could be determined for both ears in each case for the phases of compression and decompression.
RESULTS: In 49 participants, we could interpret the data successfully. On average, an output value (without pressure changes) of the impedance of 0.58 ±0.11 Pa on the right side and 0.43 ± 0.1 Pa on the left side were measured. During decompression, 0.098 ± 0.05 Pa (right) and 0.087 ± 0.043 Pa (left) could be determined. For compression, values of 0.086 ± 0.044 Pa on the right and 0.079 ± 0.045 Pa on the left were detected. The retest reliability was higher with an intraclass correlation coefficient for the decompression MI of 0.833 than the 0.772 compression MI.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to measure MI in healthy subjects during compression and decompression. This value represents a good average in terms of the pressure tolerance of the middle ear. In future, studies will be required to determine whether MI will be a useful parameter in differentiating normal and abnormal ET function.
BACKGROUND: The continuous impedance measurement in a pressure chamber can provide valuable information about the opening function of the ET.
METHODS: Around 55 ear-healthy volunteers were examined in a pressure chamber. These were subjected to a decompression phase and a compression phase. The pressure change was constantly 20 kPa/min. Using evaluation software, the MI could be determined for both ears in each case for the phases of compression and decompression.
RESULTS: In 49 participants, we could interpret the data successfully. On average, an output value (without pressure changes) of the impedance of 0.58 ±0.11 Pa on the right side and 0.43 ± 0.1 Pa on the left side were measured. During decompression, 0.098 ± 0.05 Pa (right) and 0.087 ± 0.043 Pa (left) could be determined. For compression, values of 0.086 ± 0.044 Pa on the right and 0.079 ± 0.045 Pa on the left were detected. The retest reliability was higher with an intraclass correlation coefficient for the decompression MI of 0.833 than the 0.772 compression MI.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to measure MI in healthy subjects during compression and decompression. This value represents a good average in terms of the pressure tolerance of the middle ear. In future, studies will be required to determine whether MI will be a useful parameter in differentiating normal and abnormal ET function.