Hepato-gastroenterology · 2012
Risk factor for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy performed by a surgeon during a learning curve: analysis of a single surgeon's experiences of 100 consecutive patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Noda Hiroshi, Kamiyama Hidenori, Kato Takaharu, Watanabe Fumiaki, Toyama Nobuyuki, Konishi Fumio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Among several kinds of morbidities, pancreatic fistula (PF) is the most common complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, it has not been clarified what kind of perioperative factors are risk factors of PF after PD is performed by a training surgeon.
METHODOLOGY: We evaluated the risk factors of PF after PD in which all procedures for 100 consecutive patients were performed by a single training surgeon, retrospectively. The 100 cases were divided into two groups and the first 50 cases were named Group A and the latter 50 cases were named Group B.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the absence of main pancreatic duct dilatation was an independent risk factor for grade B and grade C PF (p=0.0080; OR=5.311; 95% CI=1.116-7.025). There was no significant difference of the frequencies of grade B and grade C PF between Group A and Group B (p=0.13361).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the absence of main pancreatic duct dilatation was an independent risk factor for grade B and grade C PF after PD was performed by a training surgeon; for those without pancreatic duct dilatation, PD can be performed by a surgeon in the earlier training period with an acceptable rate of PF.
METHODOLOGY: We evaluated the risk factors of PF after PD in which all procedures for 100 consecutive patients were performed by a single training surgeon, retrospectively. The 100 cases were divided into two groups and the first 50 cases were named Group A and the latter 50 cases were named Group B.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the absence of main pancreatic duct dilatation was an independent risk factor for grade B and grade C PF (p=0.0080; OR=5.311; 95% CI=1.116-7.025). There was no significant difference of the frequencies of grade B and grade C PF between Group A and Group B (p=0.13361).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the absence of main pancreatic duct dilatation was an independent risk factor for grade B and grade C PF after PD was performed by a training surgeon; for those without pancreatic duct dilatation, PD can be performed by a surgeon in the earlier training period with an acceptable rate of PF.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChi-Square DistributionClinical CompetenceDilatation, PathologicFemaleHumansJapanLearning CurveLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPancreatic DuctsPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult