Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) · 2024
Vertical alveolar bone augmentation of atrophied posterior mandibular regions with simultaneous dental implant placement using allogeneic bone rings vs autogenous bone rings: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ragab Mahmoud Alaa El-Deen, Mohammad Yassin Salah, Ali Hassan Sherief, Sayed Abdelmoneim Hesham
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Ideal implant placement in atrophied posterior mandibular regions is challenging due to surgical difficulties and anatomical limitations. This study aimed to evaluate the use of allogeneic bone rings for vertical augmentation of atrophied posterior mandibular regions with simultaneous implants compared to autogenous bone rings, while avoiding donor site morbidity.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 24 vertically atrophied posterior mandibular segments (in 14 patients) were equally randomized into a study group in which mineralized freeze-dried allogeneic bone rings were used, and a control group in which autogenous bone rings with prepared implant osteotomies were harvested from the chin and used. All augmentation sites were prepared before inserting the bone rings. Implants were simultaneously inserted, fixing the bone rings into the native bone. All patients were clinically assessed after 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month. Crestal bone level was radiographically assessed after 1 week, 6 months, and 3 months of prosthetic loading.
RESULTS: None of the 24 bone rings showed signs of implant or graft failure. There was no significant difference in the crestal bone level between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Allogeneic bone rings can be a viable alternative to autogenous bone rings in augmenting the posterior aspect of the mandible, mitigating the concerns associated with donor site complications.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 24 vertically atrophied posterior mandibular segments (in 14 patients) were equally randomized into a study group in which mineralized freeze-dried allogeneic bone rings were used, and a control group in which autogenous bone rings with prepared implant osteotomies were harvested from the chin and used. All augmentation sites were prepared before inserting the bone rings. Implants were simultaneously inserted, fixing the bone rings into the native bone. All patients were clinically assessed after 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month. Crestal bone level was radiographically assessed after 1 week, 6 months, and 3 months of prosthetic loading.
RESULTS: None of the 24 bone rings showed signs of implant or graft failure. There was no significant difference in the crestal bone level between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Allogeneic bone rings can be a viable alternative to autogenous bone rings in augmenting the posterior aspect of the mandible, mitigating the concerns associated with donor site complications.