Journal of cutaneous pathology · 2016
Immunohistochemical evaluation of p16 expression in cutaneous histiocytic, fibrohistiocytic and undifferentiated lesions.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smith Emily H, Lowe Lori, Harms Paul W, Fullen Douglas R, Chan May P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Expression of p16 is frequently evaluated in melanocytic lesions. Expression of p16 in cutaneous histiocytic, fibrohistiocytic and undifferentiated lesions has not been well characterized.
METHODS: We evaluated p16 expression in a cohort of histiocytic (reticulohistiocytoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, xanthogranuloma, Rosai Dorfman disease and xanthoma), fibrohistiocytic (dermatofibroma, epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) and undifferentiated (atypical fibroxanthoma and pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma) lesions. A group of melanocytic lesions (Spitz nevus, ordinary nevus, spitzoid melanoma and non-spitzoid melanoma) were also evaluated as reference. Each case was scored by the proportion of p16-positive cells and by staining intensity.
RESULTS: Immunoreactivity for p16 was found in almost all histiocytic (28/30, 93%) and fibrohistiocytic (22/24, 92%) lesions. About half of the undifferentiated lesions also exhibited p16 staining (9/17, 53%). Most of the melanocytic cases examined in this study expressed p16. A wide range of staining intensity and proportion of p16-positive cells was observed in most groups.
CONCLUSION: Expression of p16 is common, albeit variable in proportion and intensity, amongst a wide variety of cutaneous histiocytic, fibrohistiocytic and undifferentiated lesions. Further studies are required to determine if p16 expression is useful in distinguishing benign from malignant neoplasms of these types.
METHODS: We evaluated p16 expression in a cohort of histiocytic (reticulohistiocytoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, xanthogranuloma, Rosai Dorfman disease and xanthoma), fibrohistiocytic (dermatofibroma, epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) and undifferentiated (atypical fibroxanthoma and pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma) lesions. A group of melanocytic lesions (Spitz nevus, ordinary nevus, spitzoid melanoma and non-spitzoid melanoma) were also evaluated as reference. Each case was scored by the proportion of p16-positive cells and by staining intensity.
RESULTS: Immunoreactivity for p16 was found in almost all histiocytic (28/30, 93%) and fibrohistiocytic (22/24, 92%) lesions. About half of the undifferentiated lesions also exhibited p16 staining (9/17, 53%). Most of the melanocytic cases examined in this study expressed p16. A wide range of staining intensity and proportion of p16-positive cells was observed in most groups.
CONCLUSION: Expression of p16 is common, albeit variable in proportion and intensity, amongst a wide variety of cutaneous histiocytic, fibrohistiocytic and undifferentiated lesions. Further studies are required to determine if p16 expression is useful in distinguishing benign from malignant neoplasms of these types.