MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/a-2777-1902

Медицинская библиотека · Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie · 2026

[Myasthenic syndromes: retrospective analysis of two patient cohorts].

Lorenz Felix Maximilian Xaver, Schoser Benedikt

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) are rare autoimmune-mediated neuromuscular diseases characterized by muscle weakness. Although various treatment options are available for MG, a subset of patients may be considered treatment-refractory, with differing definitions of this status present in the scientific literature. This monocentric, retrospective cohort study investigated 200 patients with MG and 15 patients with LEMS. Data on clinical characteristics, antibody status, treatment response, and concomitant diseases were collected. MG patients who received at least three different immunosuppressants during their disease history were categorized as treatment-refractory. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS.11.5% of MG patients (n=23) were classified as treatment-refractory. According to the MGFA classification, these patients were more likely to exhibit severe disease, have a higher prevalence of MuSK antibodies, and experience increased cardiovascular comorbidities. The results indicate that patients in the treatment-refractory group exhibited severe disease progression more frequently according to the MGFA classification and required escalation therapies more often. However, a standardized definition of therapy-refractory MG is not yet available.

Для цитирования: Lorenz Felix Maximilian Xaver, Schoser Benedikt. [Myasthenic syndromes: retrospective analysis of two patient cohorts].. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie. 2026. DOI: 10.1055/a-2777-1902.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.