Neurourology and urodynamics · 2003
Effect of the Bowman-Birk inhibitor (a soy protein) on in vitro bladder neck/urethral and penile corporal smooth muscle activity.
СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Malkowicz S Bruce, Liu Shih-Ping, Broderick Gregory A, Wein Alan J, Kennedy Ann R, Levin Robert M
Аннотация
AIMS: The Bowman-Birk inhibitor (BBI), is a serine protease inhibitor derived from soy beans, which is presently being evaluated in clinical trials for its ability to serve as a cancer preventive or anti-inflammatory agent. The form of BBI currently in clinical trials is known as Bowman-Birk inhibitor concentrate (BBIC). There have been anecdotal reports from patients of improved voiding and sexual functions in the ongoing BBIC trials. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of BBI and BBIC on urethral and corporal smooth muscle activity.
METHODS: In vitro muscle strip studies of New Zealand White rabbit urethra/bladder neck and penile corpora in the presence or absence of BBI or BBIC incubation (5 mg/mL) were performed.
RESULTS: In dose-response curves to alpha stimulation, BBI mediated a shift to the right (decreased receptor sensitivity in bladder/urethra as well as corpora with no change in the maximal response). Bladder base/ urethra contraction by field stimulation was significantly inhibited by BBI at higher frequencies (1-32 Hz) (12.2 + 0.8 g vs. 6.3 + 0.75 g, P < 0.05). BBI inhibited field stimulated relaxation of corporal muscle at lower frequencies. Muscarinic contraction of the bladder neck/urethra in alpha prestimulated tissue was significantly inhibited by BBI (5.3 + 0.2 g vs. 2.7 + 0.1 g, P < 0.05). BBI has an inhibitory effect on alpha adrenergic dose-response curves in bladder neck/urethral and corpora smooth muscle. BBI also significantly inhibited neurohumoral cholinergic release and in vitro muscarinic contraction of the urethra. The effects on corpora relaxation were less pronounced.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the phytochemical BBI may promote physiologic effects of urethral relaxation and improved voiding by unique mechanisms and deserves further study as a pharmacologic agent for lower urinary tract symptoms.
METHODS: In vitro muscle strip studies of New Zealand White rabbit urethra/bladder neck and penile corpora in the presence or absence of BBI or BBIC incubation (5 mg/mL) were performed.
RESULTS: In dose-response curves to alpha stimulation, BBI mediated a shift to the right (decreased receptor sensitivity in bladder/urethra as well as corpora with no change in the maximal response). Bladder base/ urethra contraction by field stimulation was significantly inhibited by BBI at higher frequencies (1-32 Hz) (12.2 + 0.8 g vs. 6.3 + 0.75 g, P < 0.05). BBI inhibited field stimulated relaxation of corporal muscle at lower frequencies. Muscarinic contraction of the bladder neck/urethra in alpha prestimulated tissue was significantly inhibited by BBI (5.3 + 0.2 g vs. 2.7 + 0.1 g, P < 0.05). BBI has an inhibitory effect on alpha adrenergic dose-response curves in bladder neck/urethral and corpora smooth muscle. BBI also significantly inhibited neurohumoral cholinergic release and in vitro muscarinic contraction of the urethra. The effects on corpora relaxation were less pronounced.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the phytochemical BBI may promote physiologic effects of urethral relaxation and improved voiding by unique mechanisms and deserves further study as a pharmacologic agent for lower urinary tract symptoms.