British journal of urology · 1995
Urinary tract obstruction and nephrostomy drainage in pelvic malignant disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lau M W, Temperley D E, Mehta S, Johnson R J, Barnard R J, Clarke N W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival of patients after percutaneous nephrostomy drainage (PND) for obstructive uropathy secondary to pelvic malignant disease.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 77 patients undergoing PND for obstructive uropathy were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the nature of the obstructing lesion: Group I (primary untreated malignancy, 31 patients); Group II (recurrent malignancy with further treatment, 15 patients); Group III (recurrent malignancy with no further treatment, 12 patients); and Group IV (benign disease as a consequence of previous treatment, 19 patients). Outcome was assessed by survival over a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 2 days-8.3 years).
RESULTS: Overall median survival was 26 weeks, with a 5-year survival of 22%. The survival in Groups I and II was not significantly different (median survival 27 and 20 weeks, respectively; 5-year survival, 10% and 20%, respectively). Group III patients had a poor prognosis (median survival 6.5 weeks) with no patient surviving beyond one year, whilst Group IV patients fared best with a 5-year survival of 64%. The commonest primary tumour type was carcinoma of the cervix (42 patients), and these patients were analysed as a subset. Benign post-radiation fibrosis was found in 16 of 27 patients (59%). Survival was related to the diagnostic group.
CONCLUSION: The nature and extent of the obstructing lesion and its potential for further treatment are the major determinants of post-nephrostomy survival. Every effort should therefore be made to identify the nature of the obstruction before deciding on PND.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 77 patients undergoing PND for obstructive uropathy were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the nature of the obstructing lesion: Group I (primary untreated malignancy, 31 patients); Group II (recurrent malignancy with further treatment, 15 patients); Group III (recurrent malignancy with no further treatment, 12 patients); and Group IV (benign disease as a consequence of previous treatment, 19 patients). Outcome was assessed by survival over a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 2 days-8.3 years).
RESULTS: Overall median survival was 26 weeks, with a 5-year survival of 22%. The survival in Groups I and II was not significantly different (median survival 27 and 20 weeks, respectively; 5-year survival, 10% and 20%, respectively). Group III patients had a poor prognosis (median survival 6.5 weeks) with no patient surviving beyond one year, whilst Group IV patients fared best with a 5-year survival of 64%. The commonest primary tumour type was carcinoma of the cervix (42 patients), and these patients were analysed as a subset. Benign post-radiation fibrosis was found in 16 of 27 patients (59%). Survival was related to the diagnostic group.
CONCLUSION: The nature and extent of the obstructing lesion and its potential for further treatment are the major determinants of post-nephrostomy survival. Every effort should therefore be made to identify the nature of the obstruction before deciding on PND.