Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2018
Assessing normal values for the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module: An observational study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Radulesco T, Mancini J, Penicaud M, Dessi P, Michel J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine normal values for the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module.
DESIGN: A prospective monocentric observational cohort study.
SETTING: We tested FACE-Q Satisfaction with Nose and Satisfaction with Nostrils in two groups of patients, seeking or not a rhinoplasty.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and four patients were included in the study, fifty-two in each group.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was to identify possible cutting scores to establish normal values for each of the FQRM questionnaires.
RESULTS: Regarding the Satisfaction with Nose scale, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < .001). Area under the ROC curve was 0.964 (95% CI = 0.931-0.997). Forty-seven points was the value presenting the best Youden index (sensitivity = 96.2%, specificity = 86.5%). Regarding the Satisfaction with Nostrils scale, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < .001). Area under the ROC curve was 0.820 (95% CI = 0.741-0.899). Sixty-four points was the value presenting the best Youden index (sensitivity = 94.2%, specificity = 53.8%).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to generate normative data for the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. The findings presented here have important implications for future clinical care and research. The definition of a normal score can help practitioners to better analyse their patients and to support a therapeutic indication.
DESIGN: A prospective monocentric observational cohort study.
SETTING: We tested FACE-Q Satisfaction with Nose and Satisfaction with Nostrils in two groups of patients, seeking or not a rhinoplasty.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and four patients were included in the study, fifty-two in each group.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was to identify possible cutting scores to establish normal values for each of the FQRM questionnaires.
RESULTS: Regarding the Satisfaction with Nose scale, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < .001). Area under the ROC curve was 0.964 (95% CI = 0.931-0.997). Forty-seven points was the value presenting the best Youden index (sensitivity = 96.2%, specificity = 86.5%). Regarding the Satisfaction with Nostrils scale, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < .001). Area under the ROC curve was 0.820 (95% CI = 0.741-0.899). Sixty-four points was the value presenting the best Youden index (sensitivity = 94.2%, specificity = 53.8%).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to generate normative data for the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. The findings presented here have important implications for future clinical care and research. The definition of a normal score can help practitioners to better analyse their patients and to support a therapeutic indication.