EJNMMI physics · 2023
Optimisation of the air fraction correction for lung PET/CT: addressing resolution mismatch.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leek Francesca, Anderson Cameron, Robinson Andrew P, Moss Robert M, Porter Joanna C, Garthwaite Helen S, Groves Ashley M, Hutton Brian F, Thielemans Kris
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Increased pulmonary [Formula: see text]F-FDG metabolism in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and other forms of diffuse parenchymal lung disease, can predict measurements of health and lung physiology. To improve PET quantification, voxel-wise air fractions (AF) determined from CT can be used to correct for variable air content in lung PET/CT. However, resolution mismatches between PET and CT can cause artefacts in the AF-corrected image.
METHODS: Three methodologies for determining the optimal kernel to smooth the CT are compared with noiseless simulations and non-TOF MLEM reconstructions of a patient-realistic digital phantom: (i) the point source insertion-and-subtraction method, [Formula: see text]; (ii) AF-correcting with varyingly smoothed CT to achieve the lowest RMSE with respect to the ground truth (GT) AF-corrected volume of interest (VOI), [Formula: see text]; iii) smoothing the GT image to match the reconstruction within the VOI, [Formula: see text]. The methods were evaluated both using VOI-specific kernels, and a single global kernel optimised for the six VOIs combined. Furthermore, [Formula: see text] was implemented on thorax phantom data measured on two clinical PET/CT scanners with various reconstruction protocols.
RESULTS: The simulations demonstrated that at [Formula: see text] iterations (200 i), the kernel width was dependent on iteration number and VOI position in the lung. The [Formula: see text] method estimated a lower, more uniform, kernel width in all parts of the lung investigated. However, all three methods resulted in approximately equivalent AF-corrected VOI RMSEs (<10%) at [Formula: see text]200i. The insensitivity of AF-corrected quantification to kernel width suggests that a single global kernel could be used. For all three methodologies, the computed global kernel resulted in an AF-corrected lung RMSE <10% at [Formula: see text]200i, while larger lung RMSEs were observed for the VOI-specific kernels. The global kernel approach was then employed with the [Formula: see text] method on measured data. The optimally smoothed GT emission matched the reconstructed image well, both within the VOI and the lung background. VOI RMSE was <10%, pre-AFC, for all reconstructions investigated.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulations for non-TOF PET indicated that around 200i were needed to approach image resolution stability in the lung. In addition, at this iteration number, a single global kernel, determined from several VOIs, for AFC, performed well over the whole lung. The [Formula: see text] method has the potential to be used to determine the kernel for AFC from scans of phantoms on clinical scanners.
METHODS: Three methodologies for determining the optimal kernel to smooth the CT are compared with noiseless simulations and non-TOF MLEM reconstructions of a patient-realistic digital phantom: (i) the point source insertion-and-subtraction method, [Formula: see text]; (ii) AF-correcting with varyingly smoothed CT to achieve the lowest RMSE with respect to the ground truth (GT) AF-corrected volume of interest (VOI), [Formula: see text]; iii) smoothing the GT image to match the reconstruction within the VOI, [Formula: see text]. The methods were evaluated both using VOI-specific kernels, and a single global kernel optimised for the six VOIs combined. Furthermore, [Formula: see text] was implemented on thorax phantom data measured on two clinical PET/CT scanners with various reconstruction protocols.
RESULTS: The simulations demonstrated that at [Formula: see text] iterations (200 i), the kernel width was dependent on iteration number and VOI position in the lung. The [Formula: see text] method estimated a lower, more uniform, kernel width in all parts of the lung investigated. However, all three methods resulted in approximately equivalent AF-corrected VOI RMSEs (<10%) at [Formula: see text]200i. The insensitivity of AF-corrected quantification to kernel width suggests that a single global kernel could be used. For all three methodologies, the computed global kernel resulted in an AF-corrected lung RMSE <10% at [Formula: see text]200i, while larger lung RMSEs were observed for the VOI-specific kernels. The global kernel approach was then employed with the [Formula: see text] method on measured data. The optimally smoothed GT emission matched the reconstructed image well, both within the VOI and the lung background. VOI RMSE was <10%, pre-AFC, for all reconstructions investigated.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulations for non-TOF PET indicated that around 200i were needed to approach image resolution stability in the lung. In addition, at this iteration number, a single global kernel, determined from several VOIs, for AFC, performed well over the whole lung. The [Formula: see text] method has the potential to be used to determine the kernel for AFC from scans of phantoms on clinical scanners.