Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
Post-Activation Performance Enhancement of Lower Limb with Variable Resistance Back Squat at Different Depths.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ng Choon Yeow, Lum Danny
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study compared the acute effect of performing quarter (QS) and parallel (PS) squat with variable resistance (VR) on countermovement jump (CMJ) performance.
METHODS: Fifteen resistance trained athletes (age: 27.0 ± 3.7 years, bodyweight: 68.4 ± 7.7 kg, height: 169.7 ± 6.9 cm) performed either the QS or PS to induce post-activation performance enhancement on two separate occasions. During each session, participants performed three repetitions of baseline CMJ prior to performing three repetitions of either QS or PS at their three-repetition maximum load. Participants then performed the post-test CMJ after a five-minute recovery period.
RESULTS: Both conditions resulted in increased jump height (QS: p < 0.001, g = 0.19, PS: p < 0.001, g = 0.35). Countermovement depth and time to take-off were significantly decreased in QS (p < 0.001, g = 0.63 and p = 0.005, g = 0.30, respectively) but significantly increased in PS (p = 0.027, g = 0.39 and p < 0.001, g = 0.36, respectively). Mean propulsion force was significantly increased in QS (p < 0.001, g = 0.23) but significantly decreased in PS (p = 0.083, g = 0.13). PS resulted in greater change in jump height (p < 0.001, g = 1.34) and time to take-off (p = 0.005, g = 1.25), while QS resulted in greater change in countermovement depth (p < 0.001, g = 2.33) and mean propulsion force (p < 0.001, g = 1.67).
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that performing PS and QS with VR was effective in enhancing CMJ height. However, the two conditions resulted in participants adopting different jump strategies when performing the post-test CMJ.
METHODS: Fifteen resistance trained athletes (age: 27.0 ± 3.7 years, bodyweight: 68.4 ± 7.7 kg, height: 169.7 ± 6.9 cm) performed either the QS or PS to induce post-activation performance enhancement on two separate occasions. During each session, participants performed three repetitions of baseline CMJ prior to performing three repetitions of either QS or PS at their three-repetition maximum load. Participants then performed the post-test CMJ after a five-minute recovery period.
RESULTS: Both conditions resulted in increased jump height (QS: p < 0.001, g = 0.19, PS: p < 0.001, g = 0.35). Countermovement depth and time to take-off were significantly decreased in QS (p < 0.001, g = 0.63 and p = 0.005, g = 0.30, respectively) but significantly increased in PS (p = 0.027, g = 0.39 and p < 0.001, g = 0.36, respectively). Mean propulsion force was significantly increased in QS (p < 0.001, g = 0.23) but significantly decreased in PS (p = 0.083, g = 0.13). PS resulted in greater change in jump height (p < 0.001, g = 1.34) and time to take-off (p = 0.005, g = 1.25), while QS resulted in greater change in countermovement depth (p < 0.001, g = 2.33) and mean propulsion force (p < 0.001, g = 1.67).
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that performing PS and QS with VR was effective in enhancing CMJ height. However, the two conditions resulted in participants adopting different jump strategies when performing the post-test CMJ.