Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2002
Diagnostic value of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate and 99mTc-pentavalent DMSA compared with 99mTc-sestamibi for palpable breast lesions.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Massardo Teresa, Alonso Omar, Kabasakal Levent, Llamas-Olier Augusto, Shankar Uma Ravi, Zhu Huiqing, Delgado Lucía, González Patricio, Mut Fernando, Padhy Ajit K
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Different radiopharmaceuticals have been used to detect breast cancer. Among them, sestamibi has been extensively studied and has come to have a well-recognized role in the evaluation of palpable breast lesions. The goal of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of 99mTc-labeled compounds, such as methylene diphosphonate (MDP) and pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA-V), with sestamibi for palpable breast lesions, in the scope of a multicenter trial sponsored by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
METHODS: Patients from 7 countries were included: 47 women (mean age, 54 +/- 13 y) examined with MDP and sestamibi and 111 women (mean age, 55 +/- 12 y) examined with DMSA-V and sestamibi. Cancer was diagnosed in 41 of 49 lesions from the MDP group and in 78 of 113 lesions from the DMSA-V group. Axillary lymph node involvement was observed in 18 of 30 patients from the first group and in 27 of 53 patients from the second group. Prone scintimammography was performed using a dose of 740 MBq of each tracer, and diagnostic values were calculated from a masked interpretation of scans.
RESULTS: In the first group, the sensitivity for sestamibi and MDP studies was 82.9% and 65.9%, respectively, with a specificity of 87.5% and 50%, respectively. In the second group, the sensitivity for sestamibi and DMSA-V studies was 87.2% and 65.4%, respectively, with a specificity of 77.1% and 74.3%, respectively. Regarding axillary involvement, the sensitivity was 33.3% for sestamibi in both groups, whereas the values for MDP and DMSA-V were 16.7% and 7.4%, respectively. In contrast, the specificity for sestamibi was 83.3% and 92.3% for the first and second groups, respectively, and the specificity for MDP and DMSA-V was 91.7% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Sestamibi is the most adequate alternative among the mentioned 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for the evaluation of palpable breast lesions.
METHODS: Patients from 7 countries were included: 47 women (mean age, 54 +/- 13 y) examined with MDP and sestamibi and 111 women (mean age, 55 +/- 12 y) examined with DMSA-V and sestamibi. Cancer was diagnosed in 41 of 49 lesions from the MDP group and in 78 of 113 lesions from the DMSA-V group. Axillary lymph node involvement was observed in 18 of 30 patients from the first group and in 27 of 53 patients from the second group. Prone scintimammography was performed using a dose of 740 MBq of each tracer, and diagnostic values were calculated from a masked interpretation of scans.
RESULTS: In the first group, the sensitivity for sestamibi and MDP studies was 82.9% and 65.9%, respectively, with a specificity of 87.5% and 50%, respectively. In the second group, the sensitivity for sestamibi and DMSA-V studies was 87.2% and 65.4%, respectively, with a specificity of 77.1% and 74.3%, respectively. Regarding axillary involvement, the sensitivity was 33.3% for sestamibi in both groups, whereas the values for MDP and DMSA-V were 16.7% and 7.4%, respectively. In contrast, the specificity for sestamibi was 83.3% and 92.3% for the first and second groups, respectively, and the specificity for MDP and DMSA-V was 91.7% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Sestamibi is the most adequate alternative among the mentioned 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for the evaluation of palpable breast lesions.