MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icb.0000000000001096

Медицинская библиотека · Retinal cases & brief reports · 2022

CAVITARY CHOROIDAL NEVUS: A CASE REPORT.

Preziosa Chiara, Kashyap Bibhuti P, Staurenghi Giovanni, Pellegrini Marco

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe a case of choroidal nevus with intralesional cavitations detected with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography and to show its changes during an 8-year follow-up.

METHODS

A case report.

RESULTS

A 55-year-old male patient was found to have a pigmented lesion at the posterior pole of his right eye, just temporal to the fovea. A complete multiimaging examination was obtained and showed a lesion of about 4 mm of diameter with a small amount of subretinal fluid and chronic changes in the retina overlying the lesion. Based on clinical examination, a diagnosis of choroidal nevus was made, but interestingly the enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography revealed the presence of intralesional cavitations. Close follow-up with no intervention was planned, and over 8 years of observation, the lesion remained stable in size, with a gradual increase of the central necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Benign pigmented choroidal lesions can show internal cavitations likely secondary to internal necrosis. This feature does not represent a sign of malignancy of the lesion. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography is a feasible imaging tool for the visualization of the internal cavitations and to follow their evolution over time.

Для цитирования: Preziosa Chiara, Kashyap Bibhuti P, Staurenghi Giovanni, Pellegrini Marco. CAVITARY CHOROIDAL NEVUS: A CASE REPORT.. Retinal cases & brief reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000001096.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.