Annals of surgical oncology · 2015
A Predictive Score for Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (SeC-Score): A Single-Centre, Controlled Study for Preoperative Patient Selection.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Angioli Roberto, Capriglione Stella, Aloisi Alessia, Ricciardi Roberto, Scaletta Giuseppe, Lopez Salvatore, Miranda Andrea, Di Pinto Anna, Terranova Corrado, Plotti Francesco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The standard treatments of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) remains poorly defined. Chemotherapy (CT) and secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) represent both valid options, even if several studies demonstrated a greater survival benefit, with survival rates up to 62 months, for platinum-sensitive patients undergoing complete SCS. The purpose of the present study was to develop a predictive model, named SeC-Score (SeC-s), to assess the risk of optimal SCS, including, for the first time in literature, HE4.
METHODS: All patients affected by suspicious ROC at radiologic imaging, referred to the Department of Gynecology of Campus Bio-medico of Rome, were prospectively included in the study. The preoperative variables considered in our predictive model were: age, residual tumour (RT) at primary cytoreduction (0 vs. >0 cm), preoperative CA125 and HE4, and ascites at recurrence. After exploratory laparotomy, patients were submitted to secondary SCS (Group A) or addressed to CT (Group B).
RESULTS: A total of 135 patients with ROC were considered for the analysis. Preoperative CA125, HE4, ascites, and RT at first surgery were found statistically significant and included into a multivariate logistic regression model to determine the risk to not optimal SCS. In the overall cohort of patients, SeC-s reported sensitivity and specificity of 82 and 83 %, respectively (PPV = 0.79, NPV = 0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of SeC-s to preoperative triage patients suitable of optimal SCS, even if external validation is needed.
METHODS: All patients affected by suspicious ROC at radiologic imaging, referred to the Department of Gynecology of Campus Bio-medico of Rome, were prospectively included in the study. The preoperative variables considered in our predictive model were: age, residual tumour (RT) at primary cytoreduction (0 vs. >0 cm), preoperative CA125 and HE4, and ascites at recurrence. After exploratory laparotomy, patients were submitted to secondary SCS (Group A) or addressed to CT (Group B).
RESULTS: A total of 135 patients with ROC were considered for the analysis. Preoperative CA125, HE4, ascites, and RT at first surgery were found statistically significant and included into a multivariate logistic regression model to determine the risk to not optimal SCS. In the overall cohort of patients, SeC-s reported sensitivity and specificity of 82 and 83 %, respectively (PPV = 0.79, NPV = 0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of SeC-s to preoperative triage patients suitable of optimal SCS, even if external validation is needed.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProteinsROC CurveResearch DesignWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2