MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.26604

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2021

Laryngeal soft tissue sarcoma: Systematic review and individual patient data analysis of 300 cases.

Ramdulari Anjali V, Izzuddeen Yousra, Benson Rony, Mallick Supriya, Venkatesulu Bhanuprasad, Giridhar Prashanth

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laryngeal sarcoma is rare. We performed a systematic review and individual patient analysis to evaluate the patterns of care, prognostic factors, and role of radiotherapy in laryngeal soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

A systematic search on PubMed and Google scholar was done. An individual patient data analysis was done.

RESULTS

Of the 300 cases of laryngeal sarcoma, 80% underwent surgery. 44% underwent larynx preservation surgery and 25% received radiotherapy with surgery. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 48 months and overall survival (OS) of 224 months for the entire cohort. Patients with large primary, cartilage invasion, and positive margins had numerically worse PFS. Cartilage invasion and primary tumor size >3 cm were the most common risk factors for adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients receiving radiotherapy were not associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

Laryngeal sarcoma associated with a good survival. Larynx preservation surgery is feasible in nearly half patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy may be warranted in patients poor prognostic factors.

Для цитирования: Ramdulari Anjali V, Izzuddeen Yousra, Benson Rony, Mallick Supriya, Venkatesulu Bhanuprasad, Giridhar Prashanth. Laryngeal soft tissue sarcoma: Systematic review and individual patient data analysis of 300 cases.. Head & neck. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26604.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.