Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2014
Equivalence of BCR-ABL transcript levels with complete cytogenetic remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lauseker Michael, Hanfstein Benjamin, Haferlach Claudia, Schnittger Susanne, Pfirrmann Markus, Fabarius Alice, Schlegelberger Brigitte, Saußele Susanne, Dietz Christian T, Erben Philipp, Hehlmann Rüdiger, Hasford Joerg, Hochhaus Andreas, Müller Martin C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients are monitored by both cytogenetic and molecular assessments, although present guidelines appear to switch from cytogenetic to molecular criteria. Due to the increasing use of molecular measurements, it was the aim of this work to identify a BCR-ABL level according to the international scale (BCR-ABL(IS)) as an equivalent substitute for complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR).
METHODS: In total, 1,329 paired data from 557 patients of the German CML-Study IV were evaluated. The data set was divided into a learning set and a validation set. The best cutoff was determined applying a minimal p value approach to the Fisher test.
RESULTS: In the learning set, we found BCR-ABL(IS) values between 0.2 and 1.1 % were well suited for predicting a CCyR. In the validation set, the cutoff level of 1 % led to a mean concordance rate of 90.1 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is no one-to-one cutoff for BCR-ABL(IS) representing CCyR, but we advise to use the 1 % BCR-ABL(IS) in order to avoid misclassification of CCyR patients.
METHODS: In total, 1,329 paired data from 557 patients of the German CML-Study IV were evaluated. The data set was divided into a learning set and a validation set. The best cutoff was determined applying a minimal p value approach to the Fisher test.
RESULTS: In the learning set, we found BCR-ABL(IS) values between 0.2 and 1.1 % were well suited for predicting a CCyR. In the validation set, the cutoff level of 1 % led to a mean concordance rate of 90.1 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is no one-to-one cutoff for BCR-ABL(IS) representing CCyR, but we advise to use the 1 % BCR-ABL(IS) in order to avoid misclassification of CCyR patients.