Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola · 2024
Does the number of loops affect the results of barbed pharyngoplasties? A retrospective comparison in two techniques.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carrasco Llatas Marina, Ruiz de Apodaca Paula Martínez, González Turienzo Elena, Martínez Moreno Miguel, Domínguez Celis Felipe, Cammaroto Giovanni, Vicini Claudio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The use of barbed sutures for pharyngoplasty techniques is a new trend in sleep apnea surgery, but little is known about its short-term results depending on the different techniques. The purpose of this study was to analyse the surgical results in two different centres using barbed sutures with different barbed pharyngoplasty techniques.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing surgery, all of whom underwent pharyngoplasty with barbed suture using a classic or modified technique, which may or may not be associated with other surgical techniques. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess the relationship of these surgical techniques with surgical success and with different descriptive variables.
RESULTS: The final sample size was 126 patients. A surgical success rate of 39.7% was obtained for a postoperative AHI < 10/h and a 51.6% success rate according to Sher's criteria. A greater proportion of success was observed in the modified barbed pharyngoplasty technique that was not maintained after the multivariate analysis, as with other factors such as age, ODI or the presence of nasal surgery.
CONCLUSION: Non-resective pharyngoplasty with barbed sutures is an effective technique for the treatment of OSA in selected patients, with both the classic technique and the modified alternatives having good postoperative results, with no differences observed in relation to surgical success between both. More studies are necessary to evaluate the differences between both techniques in more homogeneous groups.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing surgery, all of whom underwent pharyngoplasty with barbed suture using a classic or modified technique, which may or may not be associated with other surgical techniques. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess the relationship of these surgical techniques with surgical success and with different descriptive variables.
RESULTS: The final sample size was 126 patients. A surgical success rate of 39.7% was obtained for a postoperative AHI < 10/h and a 51.6% success rate according to Sher's criteria. A greater proportion of success was observed in the modified barbed pharyngoplasty technique that was not maintained after the multivariate analysis, as with other factors such as age, ODI or the presence of nasal surgery.
CONCLUSION: Non-resective pharyngoplasty with barbed sutures is an effective technique for the treatment of OSA in selected patients, with both the classic technique and the modified alternatives having good postoperative results, with no differences observed in relation to surgical success between both. More studies are necessary to evaluate the differences between both techniques in more homogeneous groups.