Journal of cancer research and therapeutics · 2013
Forward versus inverse planning in oropharyngeal cancer: A comparative study using physical and biological indices.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sundaram T, Nagarajan M, Nagarajan V, Supe Sanjay S, Mohanraj R, Balaji T, Jayakumar S, Balasubramaniam M, Govindarajan K N
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Possible benefits of inverse planning.
AIMS: To analyze possible benefits of inverse planning intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over field-in-field 3D conformal radiation therapy (FIF-3DCRT) and to evaluate the differences if any, between low (6 Million Volts) and high energy (15 Million Volts) IMRT plans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx, previously treated with 6 MV step and shoot IMRT were studied. V100, V33, V66 , mean dose and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were evaluated for parotid glands. Maximum dose and NTCP were the parameters for spinal cord.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: A two-tailed t-test was applied to analyze statistical significance between the different techniques.
RESULTS: For combined parotid gland, a reduction of 4.374 Gy, 9.343 Gy and 7.883 Gy were achieved for D100, D66 and D33, respectively in 6 MV-IMRT when compared with FIF-3DCRT. Spinal cord sparing was better in 6 MV-IMRT (40.963 ± 2.650), with an average reduction of maximum spinal cord dose by 7.355 Gy from that using the FIF-3DCRT technique. The uncomplicated tumor control probabilities values were higher in IMRT plans thus leading to a possibility of dose escalation.
CONCLUSIONS: Though low-energy IMRT is the preferred choice for treatment of oropharyngeal cancers, FIF-3DCRT must be given due consideration as a second choice for its well established advantages over traditional conventioan technique.
AIMS: To analyze possible benefits of inverse planning intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over field-in-field 3D conformal radiation therapy (FIF-3DCRT) and to evaluate the differences if any, between low (6 Million Volts) and high energy (15 Million Volts) IMRT plans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx, previously treated with 6 MV step and shoot IMRT were studied. V100, V33, V66 , mean dose and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were evaluated for parotid glands. Maximum dose and NTCP were the parameters for spinal cord.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: A two-tailed t-test was applied to analyze statistical significance between the different techniques.
RESULTS: For combined parotid gland, a reduction of 4.374 Gy, 9.343 Gy and 7.883 Gy were achieved for D100, D66 and D33, respectively in 6 MV-IMRT when compared with FIF-3DCRT. Spinal cord sparing was better in 6 MV-IMRT (40.963 ± 2.650), with an average reduction of maximum spinal cord dose by 7.355 Gy from that using the FIF-3DCRT technique. The uncomplicated tumor control probabilities values were higher in IMRT plans thus leading to a possibility of dose escalation.
CONCLUSIONS: Though low-energy IMRT is the preferred choice for treatment of oropharyngeal cancers, FIF-3DCRT must be given due consideration as a second choice for its well established advantages over traditional conventioan technique.