British journal of cancer · 2025
Claudin18.2-positive gastric cancer-specific changes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-driven immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsutsumi Chikanori, Ohuchida Kenoki, Yamada Yutaka, Shimada Yuki, Imamura Masaki, Son Kiwa, Mochida Yuki, Katayama Naoki, Iwamoto Chika, Torata Nobuhiro, Horioka Kohei, Shindo Koji, Mizuuchi Yusuke, Ikenaga Naoki, Nakata Kohei, Onishi Hideya, Oda Yoshinao, Nakamura Masafumi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) is a potential therapeutic target in gastric cancer (GC). However, combining chemotherapy with anti-CLDN18.2 antibodies has shown limited efficacy in CLDN18.2-positive GC, and chemotherapy-induced changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) remain unclear.
METHODS: This study analyzed 37 GC samples, including 11 CLDN18.2-positive cases, using single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence to assess chemotherapy-driven TME changes in CLDN18.2-positive GC.
RESULTS: In chemotherapy-treated CLDN18.2-positive GC, cytotoxic natural killer (NK) cells displayed antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC)-related genes at lower levels than in untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC, while regulatory T cells (Tregs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) showed TGFB1 expression at higher levels. Additionally, NK cells, Tregs, and TAMs were more abundant in chemotherapy-treated than untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC. These chemotherapy-induced changes were absent in CLDN18.2-negative GC. Cell-cell interaction analysis identified unique interactions in chemotherapy-treated CLDN18.2-positive GC, including CCL5-CCR5 signaling between cytotoxic NK cells (Sender) and effector Tregs (Receptor) and TGFB1-TGFBR signaling between effector Tregs (Sender) and TAMs (Receptor). Cytotoxic NK cells expressed CCL5 at higher levels, CCR5-positive Tregs were more prevalent, and TAMs exhibited higher TGF-β receptor signature scores in chemotherapy-treated than untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that chemotherapy can drive immunosuppressive TME modifications specific to CLDN18.2-positive GC.
METHODS: This study analyzed 37 GC samples, including 11 CLDN18.2-positive cases, using single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence to assess chemotherapy-driven TME changes in CLDN18.2-positive GC.
RESULTS: In chemotherapy-treated CLDN18.2-positive GC, cytotoxic natural killer (NK) cells displayed antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC)-related genes at lower levels than in untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC, while regulatory T cells (Tregs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) showed TGFB1 expression at higher levels. Additionally, NK cells, Tregs, and TAMs were more abundant in chemotherapy-treated than untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC. These chemotherapy-induced changes were absent in CLDN18.2-negative GC. Cell-cell interaction analysis identified unique interactions in chemotherapy-treated CLDN18.2-positive GC, including CCL5-CCR5 signaling between cytotoxic NK cells (Sender) and effector Tregs (Receptor) and TGFB1-TGFBR signaling between effector Tregs (Sender) and TAMs (Receptor). Cytotoxic NK cells expressed CCL5 at higher levels, CCR5-positive Tregs were more prevalent, and TAMs exhibited higher TGF-β receptor signature scores in chemotherapy-treated than untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that chemotherapy can drive immunosuppressive TME modifications specific to CLDN18.2-positive GC.