Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2018
Phase I study of dose escalation to dominant intraprostatic lesions using high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chapman Christopher H, Braunstein Steve E, Pouliot Jean, Noworolski Susan M, Weinberg Vivian, Cunha Adam, Kurhanewicz John, Gottschalk Alexander R, Roach Mack Iii, Hsu I-Chow
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Radiation dose escalation for prostate cancer improves biochemical control but is limited by toxicity. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) can define dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL). This phase I study evaluated dose escalation to MRSI-defined DIL using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Enrollment was closed early due to low accrual. Ten patients with prostate cancer (T2a-3b, Gleason 6-9, PSA < 20) underwent pre-treatment MRSI, and eight patients had one to three DIL identified. The eight enrolled patients received external beam radiation therapy to 45 Gy and HDR brachytherapy boost to the prostate of 19 Gy in 2 fractions. MRSI images were registered to planning CT images and DIL dose-escalated up to 150% of prescription dose while maintaining normal tissue constraints. The primary endpoint was genitourinary (GU) toxicity.
RESULTS: The median total DIL volume was 1.31 ml (range, 0.67-6.33 ml). Median DIL boost was 130% of prescription dose (range, 110-150%). Median urethra V120 was 0.15 ml (range, 0-0.4 ml) and median rectum V75 was 0.74 ml (range, 0.1-1.0 ml). Three patients had acute grade 2 GU toxicity, and two patients had late grade 2 GU toxicity. No patients had grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity, and no grade 3 or higher toxicities were noted. There were no biochemical failures with median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 2-8.5 years).
CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to MRSI-defined DIL is feasible. Toxicity was low but incompletely assessed due to limited patients' enrollment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Enrollment was closed early due to low accrual. Ten patients with prostate cancer (T2a-3b, Gleason 6-9, PSA < 20) underwent pre-treatment MRSI, and eight patients had one to three DIL identified. The eight enrolled patients received external beam radiation therapy to 45 Gy and HDR brachytherapy boost to the prostate of 19 Gy in 2 fractions. MRSI images were registered to planning CT images and DIL dose-escalated up to 150% of prescription dose while maintaining normal tissue constraints. The primary endpoint was genitourinary (GU) toxicity.
RESULTS: The median total DIL volume was 1.31 ml (range, 0.67-6.33 ml). Median DIL boost was 130% of prescription dose (range, 110-150%). Median urethra V120 was 0.15 ml (range, 0-0.4 ml) and median rectum V75 was 0.74 ml (range, 0.1-1.0 ml). Three patients had acute grade 2 GU toxicity, and two patients had late grade 2 GU toxicity. No patients had grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity, and no grade 3 or higher toxicities were noted. There were no biochemical failures with median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 2-8.5 years).
CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to MRSI-defined DIL is feasible. Toxicity was low but incompletely assessed due to limited patients' enrollment.