Transplantation · 2024
Serum Extracellular Vesicle Protein Profiling for Prediction of Corneal Transplant Rejection.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Hyun Ju, Bae Eun-Hye, Choi Jong Min, Kim Hyemee, Kim Hyeon Ji, Barreda Heather, Jung Sung Yun, Oh Joo Youn, Lee Ryang Hwa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Corneal transplantation is the most common transplant procedure worldwide. Despite immune and angiogenic privilege of the cornea, 50% to 70% of corneal transplants fail in high-risk recipients, primarily because of immune rejection. Therefore, it is crucial to identify predictive biomarkers of rejection to improve transplant survival.
METHODS: In search for predictive biomarkers, we performed proteomics analysis of serum extracellular vesicles (EVs) in a fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched (C57BL/6-to-BALB/c) murine corneal transplantation model, wherein 50% of transplants undergo rejection by day 28 following transplantation.
RESULTS: Our time course study revealed a decrease in the number of serum EVs on day 1, followed by a gradual increase by day 7. A comparative analysis of proteomics profiles of EVs from transplant recipients with rejection (rejectors) and without rejection (nonrejectors) found a distinct enrichment of histocompatibility 2, Q region locus 2, which is a part of major histocompatibility complex-class I of donor C57BL/6 mice, in day 7 EVs of rejectors, compared with nonrejectors, syngeneic controls, or naïve mice. In contrast, serum amyloid A2, a protein induced in response to injury, was increased in day 7 EVs of nonrejectors.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer noninvasive EV-based potential biomarkers for predicting corneal allograft rejection or tolerance.
METHODS: In search for predictive biomarkers, we performed proteomics analysis of serum extracellular vesicles (EVs) in a fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched (C57BL/6-to-BALB/c) murine corneal transplantation model, wherein 50% of transplants undergo rejection by day 28 following transplantation.
RESULTS: Our time course study revealed a decrease in the number of serum EVs on day 1, followed by a gradual increase by day 7. A comparative analysis of proteomics profiles of EVs from transplant recipients with rejection (rejectors) and without rejection (nonrejectors) found a distinct enrichment of histocompatibility 2, Q region locus 2, which is a part of major histocompatibility complex-class I of donor C57BL/6 mice, in day 7 EVs of rejectors, compared with nonrejectors, syngeneic controls, or naïve mice. In contrast, serum amyloid A2, a protein induced in response to injury, was increased in day 7 EVs of nonrejectors.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer noninvasive EV-based potential biomarkers for predicting corneal allograft rejection or tolerance.