Urology · 2018
Reflux Timing Is a Predictor of Successful Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Han Daniel S, Cambareri Gina, Alagiri Madhu, Chiang George
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) that occurs during either the filling or voiding phase on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) has prognostic significance on successful endoscopic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 299 patients (438 ureters) with VUR who underwent endoscopic treatment with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) at a single institution from 2010 to 2013. Success was defined as absence of VUR on 3-month follow-up VCUG. Preoperative VCUGs were analyzed to determine whether the onset of VUR occurred during the filling or voiding phase. Predictor variables to determine success were analyzed, with a specific focus on VUR timing.
RESULTS: Success rate was 319/438 (72.8%) by ureter and 202/299 (67.6%) by patient. Reflux was seen during the filling and voiding phases in 290 and 148 ureters, respectively. Success rate was 203/290 (78%) for filling VUR and 116/148 (70%) for voiding VUR. Univariable analysis revealed voiding VUR had significantly increased odds of success (odds ratio [OR] 3.2, P = .049), while high-grade reflux (OR 0.53, P = .005) had significantly decreased odds of success. Multivariable analysis showed that voiding VUR (OR 3.2, P = .005) had significantly higher odds of success while those with high grade reflux (OR 0.42, P = .017) had significantly decreased odds of success.
CONCLUSION: The timing of VUR on preoperative VCUG appears to be an important independent predictor of successful endoscopic treatment of VUR. This has important clinical considerations when selecting VUR patients who would be best candidates for endoscopic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 299 patients (438 ureters) with VUR who underwent endoscopic treatment with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) at a single institution from 2010 to 2013. Success was defined as absence of VUR on 3-month follow-up VCUG. Preoperative VCUGs were analyzed to determine whether the onset of VUR occurred during the filling or voiding phase. Predictor variables to determine success were analyzed, with a specific focus on VUR timing.
RESULTS: Success rate was 319/438 (72.8%) by ureter and 202/299 (67.6%) by patient. Reflux was seen during the filling and voiding phases in 290 and 148 ureters, respectively. Success rate was 203/290 (78%) for filling VUR and 116/148 (70%) for voiding VUR. Univariable analysis revealed voiding VUR had significantly increased odds of success (odds ratio [OR] 3.2, P = .049), while high-grade reflux (OR 0.53, P = .005) had significantly decreased odds of success. Multivariable analysis showed that voiding VUR (OR 3.2, P = .005) had significantly higher odds of success while those with high grade reflux (OR 0.42, P = .017) had significantly decreased odds of success.
CONCLUSION: The timing of VUR on preoperative VCUG appears to be an important independent predictor of successful endoscopic treatment of VUR. This has important clinical considerations when selecting VUR patients who would be best candidates for endoscopic treatment.